Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: reynoso who wrote (57459)	10/6/2001 4:42:59 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 275872

Reynoso, Re: "nobody on this thread has ever indicated he was wrong. Do you have any proof that he was wrong?" Do the research yourself. Look back on Van Smith's articles at Tom's Hardware and InQuest Marketing, and see how many of his predictions about the fall of Intel ended up coming true. wanna_bmw

To: reynoso who wrote (57459)	10/6/2001 7:49:12 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Reynoso, get to know the folks. JC's not likely to be wrong. But he can't always cite, right now. tgptndr

To: reynoso who wrote (57459)	10/6/2001 8:46:42 PM
From: jcholewa	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 275872

> No - I haven't - but nobody on this thread has ever > indicated he was wrong. Do you have any proof that he > was wrong? The burden of proof is on Van, not me. If I came out and said that aliens are secret giving advanced 0.001 micron fabbing technology to Motorola, would the spotlight be on me to prove it or on you to disprove it? Van said something which is not backed up anywhere. There is no evidence for what he said. I don't have to prove him wrong until evidence for what he said surfaces. -JC