SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (445)10/7/2001 1:21:28 AM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 15516
 
6 October: DEBKAfile’s military and intelligence sources report that Presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin, in a single 70-minuted conversation on September 23, eleven days after the terrorist assaults in New York and Washington, agreed on the deployment of tactical weapons. This is an epic shift in the global balance of strength.
Putin gave the nod for US forces poised in Central Asia to jump into Afghanistan to be armed with tactical nuclear weapons, such as small neutron bombs, which emit strong radiation, nuclear mines, shells, and other nuclear ammunition suited to commando warfare in mountainous terrain.
In return, Bush assented to Russia deploying tactical nuclear weapons units around Chechnya after Moscow’s ultimatum to the rebels, some of whom are backed by Osama Bin Laden, to surrender, went by without response. DEBKAfile’s military sources place the US nuclear weapons in four former Soviet Central Asian bases: the military air facility at Tuzel, 15 km (10 miles) northwest of the Uzbek capital of Tashkent; at Kagady in the Termez region; in Khandabad, near the city of Karshi; and at the military air base in Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan.
In addition to the nuclear weapons units, Russian bombers carrying small neutron bombs were moved to Russian military air bases around the border of the breakaway province, in Stavropol northwest of Chechnya, the Godowta base in Georgia to the south, and Mozdok in northern Osetia, northwest of Chechnya.
Russian and U.S. military sources refuse to take questions on these startling events.
The US is far from eager to actively inject a nuclear element into the war against terrorism and will not be the first to do so. According to DEBKAfile’s military sources, the US plans to hold those tactical nuclear weapons in reserve, unleashing them in the campaign against bin Laden only in certain extreme circumstances:
1. To counter a move by Bin Laden’s men first bring out nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against the US force fighting inside Afghanistan.
2. If a chemical or biological assault by the Taliban against Pakistan.
3. Should groups of bin Laden’s Al Qaeda network – either in Central Asia or the Balkans – wield these weapons of mass destruction against US military targets or US nuclear arms in other parts of the world.
4. If using them is the only way to save heavy American combat casualties.
Full accounts of impending war preparations appear in the latest issue of DEBKA-Net-Weekly, the exclusive electronic intelligence letter put out for subscribers by DEBKAfile.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (445)10/7/2001 4:30:02 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
I heard about the pipeline! Thank goodness! It is quiet here.I worried!

I had to fly half-way across the country and back within the space of three days and
have had very little sleep.

The taxi driver was knocking on my door while I was typing a message to you and Kenneth
last Wednesday morning.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (445)10/7/2001 7:01:36 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Attacks, Earnings to Depress the Market
Sunday October 7, 6:29 pm Eastern Time


"Analysts now forecast third-quarter profits will fall an average of 21.3 percent from the same period a year ago, according to Thomson Financial/First Call. That's the worst performance since the second quarter of 1991.

It gets worse. Currently, analysts expect full-year profits to be down 13.8 percent. But First Call strategists say those analysts' forecasts will probably come down about 3 percentage points more, making 2001 the worst year since at least 1969. "


By Denise Duclaux and Chelsea Emery

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street is expected to sag this week as Sunday's military strikes against Afghanistan churn up investor anxiety at the start of the worst corporate earnings season in a decade.

``We are in uncharted waters in the world of warfare,'' said Hugh Johnson,
chief investment officer at First Albany Corp.. ''That alone will create
uncertainty and some buyers will back away from the market.''

The United States on Sunday began the first leg of what it has said will be
a protracted and wide-ranging war against terrorism and the countries that
support it. Few investors were caught off guard as the reports of strikes
against targets of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan surfaced on Sunday,
but the added apprehension may be enough to snap a two-week rally in
the markets.

``Everyone understood this was coming, but it's still a negative shock at a
time when the market needs a positive shock,'' said Christian Stracke,
chief Latin American debt strategist at Commerzbank Securities.


Stocks, which tumbled to three-year lows following last month's assaults, had been crawling back on hopes for added stimulus
from the Federal Reserve and the U.S. government. But the first phase of warfare, coupled with a bleak quarterly earnings
season and a looming economic recession, is expected to put any market recovery on hold.

A handful of Wall Street strategists, however, say the reprisals for the Sept. 11 attacks, could spur a short-term patriotic rally of sorts. They draw similarities with the stocks rally that coincided with the 1991 U.S. military actions to force Iraq out of Kuwait.

``When the stock market opens on Monday, we might actually see a relief rally as we had in 1991,'' said Wells Fargo chief economist Sung Won Sohn.

WAR SCARES INVESTORS

Sunday's attacks on Afghanistan had been under preparation since air assaults leveled the twin skyscrapers of New York's
World Trade Center and damaged the Pentagon near Washington, killing around 5,600 people.

``It is not such a shockingly unexpected event that it will put markets into disarray, but how it unfolds over the next few days will be key,'' said Anthony Karydakis, senior financial economist at Banc One Capital Markets Inc. ``If it looks as if things are not wrapped up quickly, then you start to get all sorts of scenarios to worry about.''

The United States blamed Saudi-born militant Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network for the attacks and has accused Afghanistan's Taliban rulers of shielding him. Bush on Sunday vowed a ``relentless'' campaign against terror.

``I think markets typically get skittish around whenever these actions take place ... Under these circumstances, when there is uncertainty like this, people go to the safer havens and that's fixed-income assets,'' said Joel Naroff at Naroff Economic Advisers.

In the first week of trading after the Sept. 11 attacks, blue chip stocks posted their worst week since the Great Depression. Two weeks after the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, the Dow was down just 6.6 percent. When North Korea sent troops across the 38th parallel in 1950, the Dow fell just 7 percent in two weeks.

The previous periods marked beginnings of economic booms, whereas now the economy already was barely above a stall, despite a slew of rate cuts by the Federal Reserve and a tax cut from the federal government. Investors worry that the cost of fighting terrorism and the attack's impact on consumer confidence will push the economy into a recession.

The near-term outlook for corporate profits and the economy appears bleak enough to spook investors, but some strategists say any dip in the market could represent a good buying opportunity. Although a recession is widely expected, the Federal Reserve's nine interest-rate cuts this year as well as President Bush's proposal for a fat stimulus package are widely expected to
boost the economy by 2002.

``I think this a buying opportunity in general,'' said Milton Ezrati, senior economic strategist at Lord Abbett & Co, which oversees about $40 billion. ``The caveat is that the situation does not get out of control, but barring that the fundamentals are if anything better than they were.''

EARNINGS, ANOTHER ROADBLOCK

This week marks the beginning of the third-quarter earnings season, when companies report financial results and hint at what is to come later in the year. The reports are expected to show the sagging U.S. economy, as well as slower consumer and capital spending, slammed profits in the third quarter -- and could shed light on factors that may continue to weigh into next year.

Analysts now forecast third-quarter profits will fall an average of 21.3 percent from the same period a year ago, according to Thomson Financial/First Call. That's the worst performance since the second quarter of 1991.

It gets worse. Currently, analysts expect full-year profits to be down 13.8 percent. But First Call strategists say those analysts' forecasts will probably come down about 3 percentage points more, making 2001 the worst year since at least 1969.


``Earnings are going to be lower than the consensus estimates and that means there's still a downside risk to stocks,'' said Nick Sargen, global market strategist for J.P. Morgan Private Bank, which oversees $300 billion. He's telling clients to move 5 percent to 10 percent of their equity holdings to high-quality bonds. ``We believe there will be a recovery next year. But it's too
early to jump over the abyss right now.''

Also, money managers say they will likely lock in profits by selling stocks that have gained over the past two weeks as they worry about recent jobless reports.

``We've had a decent rally here. Will it continue over next week? I doubt it,'' said Gil Knight, a small-cap stock fund manager for Allied Investment Advisors, which oversees $12 billion. ``Announcements of massive layoffs will eventually make people more cautious about spending.''

Bond markets will be closed on Monday for the Columbus Day holiday. But U.S. stock exchanges will be open regular hours.

A DELUGE OF ECONOMIC DATA

Friday will bring a slew of economic data, which may help illuminate a cloudy outlook.

September retail sales and the University of Michigan's preliminary survey of consumer sentiment are expected to give a sign of whether consumer spending, which props up about two-thirds of the U.S. economy, is holding up. The Producer Price Index (PPI) is also expected, but investors said the inflation indicator will take a back seat.

Last week, stocks rose as investors snapped up battered shares after they fell to three-year lows following the Sept. 11 attacks. Stocks gained on Friday after President Bush proposed a tax-relief program of at least $60 billion to help the economy recover.

For the week, the Nasdaq composite index was up 7.1 percent, while the S&P 500 gained 2.9 percent. The Dow Jones Industrial average rose 3.1 percent.

biz.yahoo.com



To: TigerPaw who wrote (445)10/7/2001 8:57:46 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Investors are looking a little too hard for good news

" As for Dell, analyst
Richard Chu of SG Cowen stuck with his reduced estimates, and Brett
Miller of A.G. Edwards reduced his forecasts. "Dell continues to drive unit
volumes at a multiple to the market," he said. "Unfortunately, the market is
rapidly slowing, with a rebound looking further and further out."

POSTED AT 4:54 PM EDT Friday, October 05

By MATHEW INGRAM
Globe and Mail Update, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Technology investors seemed determined to
surf a wave of optimism towards the end of
this week, following positive comments from John Chambers of Cisco
Systems and Michael Dell of Dell Computer. Despite the fact that the
market was heading into a holiday weekend, and despite bad news from
server maker Sun Microsystems — including the first ever layoffs in the
company's history — the Nasdaq index rose steadily to close near break
even, after being down by more than 3 per cent at one point in the morning.

Shouldn't that be a good thing? Doesn't it show that investors are returning
to the markets and seeing opportunity, and that they are prepared to look
past the economic slowdown to more prosperous times ahead? Perhaps.
But even some of those analysts and market-watchers who would like to
see a rally are suspicious when they see such moves — moves based on not
much more than a less-than-gloomy comment from a CEO such as Mr.
Chambers or Mr. Dell. That's hardly enough to get excited about, and in
fact such "sucker" rallies increase the risk of another market drop rather than
decreasing it.

How can you gauge a sucker rally? That's hard to define — but it has to be
at least a bit of a clue when a company like Sun Microsystems says that its
losses will be even larger than the already-large ones it announced in
August, announced plans to lay off 4,000 staff, and the stock goes up 2 per
cent. This is a company that said its revenues for the current quarter will
likely be almost 20 per cent lower than analysts were expecting, and whose
business is not expected to rebound until well into next year. Oh yes, and
the stock is now trading for 95 times current year earnings forecasts.

Another computer maker, discount retailer Gateway Computer, also
reported bad news on Thursday — and its stock also rose. The company,
which has been suffering for some time as a result of a PC price war started
by Dell Computer, said that its losses for the third quarter are likely to be
four times as large as analysts had been expecting. The shares went up
almost 4 per cent. The most ambitious comment CEO and founder Ted
Waitt could make was that he was "cautiously optimistic" the company might
be able to eke out a profit in the fourth quarter, if Christmas sales went well.

But didn't Cisco and Dell's comments make up for this kind of weakness?
It's hard to see how, since John Chambers merely said Wednesday that he
was "very comfortable" with analysts' estimates for the current quarter. He
didn't say that he had "good visibility" and that things were getting better,
even a little; he didn't even say that things had stopped getting any worse.
All he said was that Cisco would probably make its numbers for the current
quarter, and the stock went up by over 20 per cent — and pulled the
Nasdaq market along with it. The index closed up 6.5 per cent.

Dell Computer performed some similar magic on Thursday: The company
said that its sales rebounded faster than it was expecting after the events of
Sept. 11, and that it believed its business had "stabilized." It also reaffirmed
its guidance for the current quarter, saying it was winning market share due
to its price war, and combined with the wave of optimism from Cisco this
boosted the entire tech sector — probably because there had been rumours
that Dell might lower its earnings estimates for the quarter.

And yet, Dell refused to provide any guidance for the next quarter,
suggesting that visibility remains murky at best. The computer maker's
market share gains are also a company-specific phenomenon — they say
virtually nothing about the health of the tech sector as a whole, except that
they reinforce the impression that the PC business has become a commodity
industry. And yet, the entire Nasdaq moved higher on the news, and Dell's
stock climbed by almost 10 per cent. It is now trading at close to 40 times
this year's earnings estimates, estimates which may yet prove to be illusory.

Some analysts certainly weren't buying the happy conclusions that investors
drew from Cisco's and Dell's comments. Lehman Brothers cut its estimates
for the company and lowered its price target, saying the company was in an
enviable position but "near-term uncertainty exists." As for Dell, analyst
Richard Chu of SG Cowen stuck with his reduced estimates, and Brett
Miller of A.G. Edwards reduced his forecasts. "Dell continues to drive unit
volumes at a multiple to the market," he said. "Unfortunately, the market is
rapidly slowing, with a rebound looking further and further out."


Does that sound like the precursor to a healthy rally? Not really. Not unless
you're desperate for good news, which some investors apparently are.


globeandmail