SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3117)10/6/2001 10:29:28 PM
From: HG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hawkmoon,

Where did you get the 8 million figure from ?

Message 16456210

I guess it is old data <1990> and you may be right...

One of the major problems the world faces is that the moderate moslems are not prepared to go against the radical moslems. They will privately agree that radicals and fundamentalists are wrong, even curse them, but they will never overtly do anything to rectify the problems....

That is why the religion remains 'in the hands of' the fundamentalists.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3117)10/6/2001 10:31:36 PM
From: ratan lal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
After all, we have some 8 million muslims living here in the US and we don't see them declaring their wives and children are property

I have a great idea. Why dont we have an exchange program. To start with we take in all the Afghanis that are stranded at the borders of Pakistan and other countries trying to escape the US attack.

Once they live here in the capitalist system and the women get educated, they go back and spread the word. And we bring in more Afghanis, maybe even of the Taliban type. Ultimately they all see this system, the women get aggressive and refuse to be property and refuse to let their children die for allah. We could have a revolution of the capitalist type.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3117)10/7/2001 1:29:34 AM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Support moderate regimes that can control their radical elements, and contain those regimes that have crossed the threshold, and cut off their economic lifelines until they get an "attitude adjustment".

This sounds like the static quo. Isn't this what we have done with Iraq for the last 10 years and didn't it create one mother of an attitude?

M