Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (132656)	10/8/2001 2:44:00 AM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>> who will replace us? << most likely china will emerge as the next superpower to challenge us. it already has trampled on the sovereignty of other nations against their will >> and typically in line with the US' view. ;-) << and many of us wonder why we are so hated and why we are attacked by terrorists? >> only b/c we want it to be that way << not all of us! >> oftentimes the un is used a way for the US to do its bidding. i don't see the alarmism that you see... not yet. << there is no point in rehashing the same point. i stand by what i said. no one ever does see it until it's too late and some entanglement arises from our misguided foreign policy. >> i also heard the taliban proclaim the US was scared to attack them. -yawn- << ridiculous argument. the world doesn't recognize or respect the words of the taliban. much of the world recognizes the authority of the UN--and it's growing all the time. >> however, on one hand you claim that politicians want the one world order and on the other hand you say it angers them when it is at work << well for one thing they don't want to surrender our sovereignty for nothing. they do get things in return. unfortunately however, no price is worth our sovereignty--and our liberty. >> do they want to give away our sovereignty or not? << yes, for a price.