Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alomex who wrote (132658)	10/7/2001 6:44:12 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

alo, this loss season might -ng-.

To: Alomex who wrote (132658)	10/7/2001 9:08:43 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

ha! Where is Danny these days anyway? is he now a greeter at Walmart?

To: Alomex who wrote (132658)	9/24/2002 6:25:28 PM
From: Alomex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Going back to October 2001 ...if anything the strength that the Nasdaq showed around 1400 makes 600 all the less likely [....] I argued back in 2000 that the NAS would find a lot of support on the way down and that 1400 would be difficult to break. Not even the bombing of NYC, which wasn't in anybody's mind back then, has changed that. It took almost a year after 9/11 to break 1400 as predicted but finally in July 2002 Nasdaq broke this resistance level for good. Next support level is 1000, and IMHO there will be yet again a lot of resistance below that...