Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (144885)	10/8/2001 3:26:54 PM
From: fingolfen	Respond to of 186894

Not sure about system stability with DDR-333, but these benchmarks are a sign of things to come. We're getting a glimmer here and a flicker there... I'm waiting to see benchmarks using the following combinations: 533MHz FSB with DDR333 + Northwood at 2.2+GHz 533MHz FSB with PC1067 RDRAM + Northwood at 2.2+GHz I honestly wish Intel was in a better position to skip the 400MHz FSB for the Northwood, although it will be interesting to compare the benchmarks of equally clocked P4's. We already know that the N'wood is going to have 2X the L2 cache. Given the time lag involved, it is conceivable that other architectural improvements have been incorporated into the N'wood. So how long until we start seeing a base 166MHz bus double or quad pumped? Even the fastest bus speeds today are double or quad pumping the old 100MHz or 133MHz settings. How fast would the P4 be with an effective 667MHz (neighbor of the beast) FSB?