Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3536)	10/8/2001 4:11:00 PM
From: Scoobah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You mean this little treat? fas.org

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3536)	10/8/2001 4:17:15 PM
From: Condor	Respond to of 281500

A first strike nuke attack, no matter how controlled, would IMO shrink the coalition by 50 % and effectively send the entire co-ordinated efforts and support into total dis-array. Methodical hunt and kill will serve much more effectively and allow for ongoing expansion of covert efforts worldwide. Nukes would be counter productive other than to an immediate smallish area. If you want to polarize and ignite the Islamic world and others.....go nuke. Bad move IMO. ( one caveat however, if a large scale attack with a weapon of mass destruction were commeted against the coalition and particularly on American soil then perhaps nukes would wash) C

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3536)	10/8/2001 4:38:56 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 281500

dont be surprised if US deploys small underground nuke after sealing off all exits to BinLaden rat cave exits Ok Jim... I promise not to be surprised if that happens.. But I reserve the right to be utterly amazed and incredulous.... :0) Hawk