Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cAPSLOCK who wrote (6651)	10/8/2001 7:48:16 PM
From: epsteinbd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27666

I fully agree on the non coincidence issue. However it is worth noting that Faultline, on the Foreign Relation threat came up with his theory : from memory : Stevens ( the first guy, caught the desease from some outdoor sports, went back to his office, worked on computers around, could have been coughing and a colleague caught it. + Traces of bacteria can still be found around the office. The theory is flawless as it explain the whole sequence of events and searches. It's odds of being correct, though are slim. We'll soon know.

To: cAPSLOCK who wrote (6651)	10/8/2001 7:49:43 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

Why don't you just wait until the results are in? There's enough history concerning newspaper reporters and their moronic escapades to give just as much credibility to the idea that these guys at that supermarket rag somehow got ahold of something they shouldn't have as thinking that it was released by a terrorist. Maybe even more, IMO. If you don't think that there's almost nothing in the world that cannot be acquired or almost no nasty deed that can't be done, if you know the right people, I am telling you that you're wrong. I don't care how hard it is, and I don't care what so called "experts" tell you. They live in a fantasy world. If a terrorist could get it, why couldn't a reporter? Terrorists don't have a monopoly on "connections".