SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D. Long who wrote (6304)10/9/2001 4:07:37 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
Re: Let the Security Council decide on the repercussions. Palestinian intransigence should NOT be tolerated any longer.

Talking of the UN Security Council...

U.S. Is Silent as Syria Joins UN Council
The Associated Press
Tuesday, October 9, 2001


UNITED NATIONS, New York Syria won a seat on the Security Council on Monday with overwhelming support from the nations of the world, despite being on the U.S. list of countries accused of sponsoring terrorism.

The General Assembly elected Syria to the powerful body for a two-year term on the first ballot. It received 160 "yes" votes from the 177 nations voting.

Guinea, Cameroon and Bulgaria were also elected on the first ballot. Mexico defeated the Dominican Republic for a Latin American seat.

Syria was the unanimous choice of Arab and Asian nations for the Asian seat on the council being vacated by Bangladesh on Jan. 1. Candidates that have unanimous regional support are almost always elected.

Last year, the United States led a successful campaign to keep Sudan, also on the U.S. list of terrorism sponsors, off the council.

But this year, despite opposition from Israel and a last-minute appeal from 38 members of the U.S. Congress to President George W. Bush to oppose Syria's candidacy, the U.S. administration has remained silent.

The U.S. deputy ambassador, James Cunningham, arriving for Monday's election, said: "It's a secret ballot."
[snip]

iht.com



To: D. Long who wrote (6304)10/9/2001 10:33:14 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
Let the Security Council decide on the repercussions

Figure the odds... Now that we've stupidly permitted the Syrians onto it...

Of course, we have until Dec 31st to enact policy since Syria doesn't begin it term until next year.

Hawk



To: D. Long who wrote (6304)10/9/2001 1:42:58 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
<< ... 98% Palestinian sovereignty in Gaza and the West Bank, with divided Jerusalem ... >>

The Palestinians used the West Bank to terrorize Israel, and to murder innocent men, women and children, for many years. Finally Israel took the West Bank, as a result of a total Arab war against them.

The Palistinians completely failed to live up to the Oslo Accords, or any other peace accord that they have signed. What would you have them sign next? Perhaps you can get Neville Chamberlain to help you create a peace treaty for Arafat to sign.

The creation of a terrorist Palestinian State would certainly lead to another war. I certainly wouldn't want a terrorist Palestinian State next to America. Why would you want one next to Israel?