SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: donald sew who wrote (21148)10/9/2001 8:41:42 AM
From: Chris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
good info. confirming my read on spx/dow weaker than naz.
thanks! enjoy those mooncakes!



To: donald sew who wrote (21148)10/9/2001 8:51:32 AM
From: sq39  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
dear donald,

i thought your mind set on writing
'oversold' when you mean 'overbought' was previously questioned??????



To: donald sew who wrote (21148)10/9/2001 9:28:53 AM
From: Arik T.G.  Respond to of 52237
 
>>It is more common than not, that rising wedges break to the downside, but its no 100%.

Read somewhere it's about 70%

ATG



To: donald sew who wrote (21148)10/9/2001 4:34:46 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
Don,

That some sort of gravestone doji on the BKX today?

stockcharts.com[l,a]daclyymy[d20010819,20011009][pb50!b200!b20][vc60]

Trannies broke:

cache.wsrn.com



To: donald sew who wrote (21148)10/9/2001 4:39:48 PM
From: Nancy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
don,

i know your stat shows a decline of 7% or more has a high probability (90% ?) of retest.
would that means from peak to bottom, and also includes a bottom that broke down (i.e. from 1600 to 1380 recently) ?
what i dont understand is the within 7% being a successful retest ? can you use an example to illustrate it ?

tkx