SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: russwinter who wrote (2678)10/11/2001 5:39:37 AM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4051
 
Couple of stocks with VERY good increases in reserves:

RESOLUTE LTD
The Board of Resolute Mining Limited announced today a significant
upgrade in the mining reserves at its Golden Pride mine in Tanzania
to 13.1 million tonnes grading 2.5g/t Au for 1,072,957 ounces.
This represents an increase of more than 500,000 ounces over the
reserves remaining at 30 June 2001 (5.8 million tonnes @ 2.91 g/t Au
for 545,929 ounces).
flq.com.au

EQUIGOLD NL
The minable gold reserve has increased by in excess of 80% and at
the current mill throughput rate of 2.5 million tonnes per annum the
mine life of the project has increased for 18 years. This almost
doubles the original mine life of 10 years.
flq.com.au



To: russwinter who wrote (2678)10/12/2001 1:55:24 AM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4051
 
First of all, I'm not about building community, like you obviously are, I'm about building personal wealth for myself and my offspring. Make no mistake. I have no newsletter to sell and no vested public interest in being politically correct or even getting ego strokes for sitting on high and dispensing buy and sell, pump and dump advice so that you can sell into strength on thin issues that you great buzz with, along with CC, marcos, jp/sensi and whoever else lights your candle.

Now, here's a screamer of a post I just read of yours, elsewhere: I can't believe it: you used the word political risk, the very thing I got shot to hell for mentioning as part of the legit gold debate on the BREADTH ENCOMPASSING thread you've abandoned with haste and particular glee.
Here's your quote:
>>
The ideal would be to hedge the SA political risk with something in a safe
setting. Obviously if SA ever blew up, you would have interruptions to what,
about two thirds of the world's PGM supply and a monster home run
elsewhere. There's SWC, but it's a dog.<<

But the comment that really shows how smart you are is that last one: "There's SWC, but it's a dog." Now, just how long have you known that?

You want to know how long I've known that and had the balls to say so? Check out the SWC thread on here, oh, and go back about 3 years, when I tried to alert the gung-ho momo/pump and dump types like yourself that there was a problem, a BIG problem with SWC and to get out of the stock. Info doesn't get any better than from consultants who have been hired by SWC to evaluate and offer paid advice to help them, and talk to them after they get home, just shaking their heads at the mess they were in even as they were 'opening up the extensions to the existing orebody'

Yeah, you may think you're good, but everyone has 20-20 hindsight, Russ. I made my call and stated why, and was thoroughly trashed for it while the stock was still climbing to the 35-38 level before it did the swan dive so apparent in the charts. Now THAT took balls and research and knowing the right insider industry people by their first names no less, ayup, the same ones that grusum thinks are so damn worthless and undesireable...

Think about it.

OH, and one other thing?...
Bob Johnson you say, is noble for doing what he's doing, and then you claim you are noble for running away because you couldn't control the conversation here by someone who didn't buy your god-complex here and then showed you up and your lack of Acurate recall about what this thread purpose statement really said?

You're just insecure and need all these guys and dolls to buy what you are pushing so that you can get out of your positions. You're no different than the incestuous thinkers on GPGI or IPMCF...your fellow threaders will learn you can't say sell, because you are:
1) in too deep and want out first
2) can't say sell, because you can't say buy either, due to SEC regs.

Your day is coming...SI's Tokyo Joe found out the hard way...you and Claude will get yours when you least expect it. It's just the nature of the topic, the newsletter biz and the SEC critter.

Thank goodness you don't get to be final judge and jury of what is "contribution" to this community. Thank goodness gold is bigger than your analytical pump and dump skillset. Thank goodness there is more history known by others than your ability to read current mining reports and then parse them out after you've taken your
position.

Thank goodness I don't walk in your shoes. When you get what's coming to you, you won't even want to walk in your own shoes!

gold_tutor