Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (190342)	10/9/2001 6:41:45 PM
From: DOUG H	Respond to of 769670

why your keen interest in what they were doing behind closed doors? Getting buffed while on the phone to foreign heads of state discussing troop deployments tells a lot about a man and his concern for our soldiers, dontcha thunk?

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (190342)	10/9/2001 6:43:26 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

but mr. bill did his consenting thing and being his stupid self did not understand the the young woman was seeing the relationship differently and he also wanted her to commit a felony by lying under oath about their relationship and he also lied to all Americans about the facts and in so doing call Monica a liar in public. Now because mr. bill was really really stupid at thinking things out he got caught in lie after lie and all because he exposed himself to another woman. That woman he paid almost a million to. Now if mr. bill had just had safe sex with a condom then all of American would have been a lot happier. But semen, a dress, some tape and Janet Reno got a decent honest Adult in the White to save America in this time of trial. Mysterious is it not. tom watson tosiwmee

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (190342)	10/9/2001 6:47:54 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 769670

Think he's still into rape? Oh sorry, that's behind closed doors - none of your business.

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (190342)	10/9/2001 8:10:46 PM
From: Srexley	Respond to of 769670

"so why your keen interest in what they were doing behind closed doors?" I wasn't behind closed doors, and I know about it. At least have your points make sense. Also - I have no "keen" or any other kind of interest in Clinton's sex life. That is a tried and true demo accusation, but one that holds no water. I simply stated something that bothered me, and that I thought was a bad influence. I don't care that his behavior does not bother you, and if you think it had no effect on our youth or was good for them, I will state that I think you are wrong. "As for a person doing their job...is this like saying that robbing banks is a job and is okay in your book?" Did you even read my post? I clearly said "legal" job. An absolute moronic statement that is completely CONTRADICTORY to the written statement I posted. Why do you do this? You seem clueless dude. The whole thing came up because JF Sheperd is very offended by Hollywood using fake smoking to sell cigarettes. I agreed with his premise, but wondered why he is not as outraged by influences from ACTUAL events from people that are supported BY HOLLYWOOD (and our tax money), and are supposed to be leading our nation. Whether you have extremely limited intelligence, or you are just trying to push my buttons I cannot tell. My guess is that you are trying to push my buttons because someone who is dumb enough to think your post makes ANY sense would have trouble typing (or plugging in their computer). Anything else, dude?