To: S100 who wrote (15698 ) 10/10/2001 8:38:33 AM From: Eric L Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857 S100, << Oh No, missing links, we feel your pain. Any idea on what is missing? >> Yes. Most of the files are on my drive. Obsolete links in some cases are in my (or others) posts to "Qualcomm - News Only" . << You do remember to save to disk? >> With Qualcomm, you betcha. With Nokia, sometimes for easy organized access, but they do an excellent job of archival on their server. I thought the web was for storage and all we needed was a thin client? <g> << 3G-1x Trials ... actual rate 135 ... right out in the open not behind the "Green Door". Actual WHAT rate? In some desert with a single user perched beneath a microwave tower? Good Qualcomm supplied data (although obviously not in a commercial environment which is why thy say 'theoretical" with some steel canyons, natural canyons, hills and forests and the obligatory desert) for 1xEV-DO in slide 4:newamerica.net Certainly quite different average user rate than the (Qualcomm) Ovum whitepaper which says:1xEV-DO achieves 2.4 Mbps peak rates in a real "commercial" fixed environment with average throughput of 1.4 Mbps and average mobile throughput of 880 Kbps. << Just because Nokirola can not seem to get a grip on CDMA does not mean that CDMA is bad. >> Question for a quiz: Nokia, Sony, Motorola all manufactured cdmaOne handsets with nonQualcomm chips to standards developed by Qualcomm. All worked fine in a cdmaOne environment. Qualcomm developed the 1xRTT standard. Nokia, Sony, Motorola legacy handsets all have problems with synch channel in 1xRTT. Does this mean: a.) CDMA Sucks B.) CDMA Standards Suck C.) Qualcomm Placed Land Mines D.) Only Qualcomm can make a CDMA Chip E.) Nokia, Sony, Motorola, are nitwits F.) Nokia, Sony, Motorola, are CDMA nitwits G.) All of the Above H.) None of the above Best, - Eric -