SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (132744)10/10/2001 6:52:51 AM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>> Craig, Saddam hussein helped finance and plan the Sep 11 attacks <<

i have yet to see this evidence presented to the american public.

>> He also has bio and chemical weapons in some stage of readiness or non-readiness <<

so does russia. should we declare war or "neutralize" them? china has weapons of mass destruction. should we declare war or "neutralize" china?

>> neutralize means to render insignificant that person's or entity's role. So in the case of saddam, that basically means killing him, since as long as he is alive he will be out to kill Americans and other westerners. <<

so your argument is that we should kill anyone who has or is trying to obtain weapons of mass destruction who you deem to have as his goal the desire to kill americans? do you think that saddam invaded kuwait because he wanted to kill americans? just how exactly has saddam been "out to kill Americans" recently? how has he directly threatened the united states?

>> I wish it were not so. But i can't change the world <<

hey, i'm not saying saddam is a saint, he is an evil man. i'm just curious how people justify the rationale for killing saddam hussein because of the terrorist attacks of 9/11. after all, china is a menace to taiwan just as saddam is a menace in the middle east. china engages in human rights violations against it's people just as saddam oppresses his own people. china has weapons of mass destruction and even threatened to use them against the US if we intervened in their taiwan affair. they forced our plane down over international waters and then held our pilots hostage. so after we topple afghanistan, iraq, iran, libya, sudan, syria, etc let's go get china too. of course then we will REALLY make russia mad, and they will want to kill americans as well. after all didn't Khrushchev say "we will bury you"? didn't the soviet union want to kill americans? weren't they "an evil empire" who were furiously producing weapons of mass destruction? seems to me that we better go "neutralize" russia as well, they still have weapons of mass destruction.

let's start WWIII!!