SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Area51 who wrote (3976)10/10/2001 1:28:47 AM
From: HG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Please go back and read my statement. I never said US was responsible. But now that you brought it up, the question remains who funded the terrorists camps for 15 years ? Who created, trained, funded and applauded Bin Ladin all those years. Hell, who funded, applauded Saddam Hussains atrocities for a long long time ? Is it so hard for you to understand that what goes around, comes around....? And please, I am not justifying Bin ladin's action, but like someone said earlier, there is always cause and effect...you can't sow weeds and expect to reap sweet fruits...

Coming back to my post, I merely said that the Moslems brought the economic problems onto themselves. Even now they refuse to revoke the article 371, and then they cry "Why doesn't anyone build factories here and give us employment ?". Doh, "Coz you made it illegal to build those factories there..."I say.

What I do think US is trying its darnest to do, is forcing India to accept the terrorism. Negotiate with pakistan, they say. Yeah. Like Sharon has been negotiating with the Palestinians. And anyway, US has a right to order Israel around. It finances the country, it arms the country. But India ? India has traditionally been too independent.

I'd like them to negotiate with Bin Ladin and the Afghans before they pass this bit of advice onto Vajpayee and people of India. Or are you saying the 15 years of terrorism in Kashmir is somehow less traumatic than the tragedy of WTC ?