Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (83)	10/10/2001 3:57:19 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

<Seems like from the news release PLY has completed the PP and drilling to start relatively soon. > Well until the money is in the bank. I don't see drilling before mid to end of November over there. <Let's get some opinions on PLY'S chances> I think they are low when compare to what GNG, SUL and IMR have already. But compare to many other grass roots, it is a very good bet. I would only have hope that they had more money and do some geophysics before they drill. The geochem anomalies are great.. but that is all. There is no other evidences.. Except maybe for that small silver leaching operation.

To: loantech who wrote (83)	10/11/2001 10:36:34 AM
From: jpthoma1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

Hi loantech. Here are a few comments following your question about PLY's chances to find something interesting. I have read Mosher's geological report available on PLY web site. Unfortunately, this report has not convinced me that this large anomaly has a near underground bedrock origin. Here are a few elements supporting my conclusion: 1) The anomalitic values are restricted to the first 20-30 cm. And they disappear so rapidly going down that I can't see how all this material comes from underneath. 2) The basal conglomerate exposed in the aroyo and at the well DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY MINERALIZED CLAST. Remember that this conglomerate is also of near bedrock origin!!!! 3) There is no known minaralization exposed WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROPERTY. Not even a single clast or little boulder! This is very very disappointing. 4) The soil is a loess, which is some kind glacial material displaced mainly by wind, topography and surface waters. I really can't explain how the mineralization reached surface without even contaminating the soil on its way up. Impossible IMHO. 5) At least 3 companies collected samples on the site. It's clear that they were safisfied with their results (and did no JV). My conclusion: The source of this anomaly is not coming from underneath. But since the only way to confirm (or invalidate) that conlusion is to use the «truth machine», so let's see what they will (or won't) find. JP