SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skywatcher who wrote (190845)10/10/2001 7:47:11 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Agreed.

Even though the Reagan-era bailout of Chrysler ultimately didn't cost the taxpayers (the bonds issued were all paid back), who is to say that that particular solution represented the 'best of all possible worlds'?

In the absence of a bailout, would GM and Ford have grown proportionately stronger... and would one of them now be the owner of Daimler (instead of Daimler being the owner of Chrysler)?

Sometimes the governmental meddling that we call 'industrial policy' works, and sometimes it doesn't... but it always has a COST.

By diverting tax receipts to one favored entity (over another), by picking and choosing winners, by saying "the government knows better than the markets", there is always an opportunity cost measured by what a higher, better use for those funds could have achieved.



To: Skywatcher who wrote (190845)10/10/2001 10:12:53 PM
From: Thehammer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I did not read the article, but I thought I saw an headline stating that the US government would receive an equity interest in any airline taking the money.