Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (145052)	10/11/2001 3:10:30 PM
From: fingolfen	Respond to of 186894

This guy would use "rocket science" to show that two plus two equals five if it suited his twisted purposes ... I'm not sure Pete has "twisted purposes." I think that would be giving him far too much credit. Rather I think he has a bad case of paradigm paralysis. In his world AMD is always better than Intel. Anything Intel does is wrong, bad, illegal or otherwise, whereas "scrappy Luke Skywalker AMD" fights the "good fight" against the "evil Empire." His arguments here remind me of those used by the Flat Earthers and Creationists. I.e. they only make sense to someone who doesn't know better, or refuses to know better...

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (145052)	10/11/2001 4:39:55 PM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Dear Tench: You do not need "rocket science"! On positively curved surfaces like a sphere of radius r, a pir long vector plus another pir long vector equals 0. Go ahead try it! You live on a nearly perfect sphere (unless you are really "out of this world!" (may be this is where you need rocket science to get back)). As to 2 plus 2 being five. Just think of a typical family. 2 parents (father and pregnant mother) plus two children equals 5 in less than a year (father, mother, kid one, kid two and a baby). No rocket science needed. Pete