Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (145058)	10/11/2001 3:37:02 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Boy, Albert, have I been giving you a ration of shet lately? Good rant! typical, Intelabees follow intel's word like a gospel no matter how moronic it is. I recall saying that it does not matter if p4 is slower than pIII at the same clock just as long as the final product is faster. That is p4-2GHz (top freq) is faster than pIII-1GHz (top freq) and that what counts. You don't care if intel faster or slower just as long as it operates at higher frequency. Why don't you feed p4 with 20GHz and make it operates at every 10th tick. Maybe that what Barrett meant when he mentioned 20GHz

To: AK2004 who wrote (145058)	10/11/2001 3:45:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Albert, <Why don't you feed p4 with 20GHz and make it operates at every 10th tick. Maybe that what Barrett meant when he mentioned 20GHz> The Pentium 4 already has a section within it that runs at 4.0 GHz. Be thankful that Intel is refraining from using this speed in its advertisements. Tenchusatsu