Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (145071)	10/11/2001 4:30:36 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 186894

Ten re: My point is that Intel already has the opportunity to exaggerate the advertised clock speed, but chooses not to. point well taken but I hope you see my point that if Intel would it might have backfired big time. re: do you think Intel should resort to using "quantispeed"? I per say never liked "quantispeed" and said it before a number of times. AMD chose to use new "pr" scheme to market their chips as performance speed and it is a lagit strategy (either I like it or not). Together with msft's support it might prove me wrong and be very beneficial for amd. As far as Intel's use of "pr" rating then it is totally up to intel's marketing team. Again, I may end up not liking it as an investor but that does not mean that it is not a legit marketing strategy. Regards -Albert