SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thehammer who wrote (191261)10/11/2001 11:16:53 PM
From: Mr. Whist  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769669
 
Nice spin job. You took some time with those comebacks, my friend.

Fact is, virtually all of the additional wealth created by American workers working longer hours in the '90s was captured in corporate profits and by corporate executive suites, which so excessively rewarded themselves over the decade that even business-friendly publications like Business Week and the Wall Street Journal began describing CEO compensation as "out of control."

Back to longer hours: The average American worker worked 1942 hours in 1990 and 1978 hours in 2000. That's a difference of nearly one work week a year.

And pleeeeeeeeeeeese ... don't compare CEOs to baseball players. That is not a valid analogy. And you know it.

And speaking of baseball ... I was born a Cardinal fan. I will die a Cardinal fan. Stan Musial was the greatest baseball player who ever lived.



To: Thehammer who wrote (191261)10/11/2001 11:19:30 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
In other words, the climate for the average American worker is getting worse, while the average American CEO is earning 571% more in 2000 than he did in 1990.

Now wait a minute pal.....This was the decade of Clinton. Are you saying that C'mon the average working man got screwed on the watch of Bill?

So the average working man got screwed on the watch of Bill. So the dems were not lying. It is all about sex. LOL

tom watson tosiwmee



To: Thehammer who wrote (191261)10/11/2001 11:26:43 PM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
Geez Hammer, after you sent out such a great post about freedom, you put out that totally one sided non response to Flap's post about CEO corporate welfare and its runaway abuses. I was disappointed in your biased illogical response.