SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gao seng who wrote (191323)10/12/2001 12:20:17 AM
From: gao seng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769668
 
Requiem for Lightweights
by Ed Cobb

Gonna change my way of thinking,
Make myself a different set of rules.
Gonna put my good foot forward,
And stop being influenced by fools.

~ Bob Dylan
When times are flush you suffer lightweights. When times are hard you do not. When the living is easy you have the luxury of attending to lightweights and their foolish concerns. When times are hard you do not. We stand just across the threshold of hard times. We will go back through that doorway one day but it will likely take a while. It is time to cut the lightweights out from the herd.

We have lived through flush times and the lightweights - fools and foolish ideas - have held sway too long. That time is past. The free world is locked in a mortal struggle with what has been termed Jihadistan, a virtual nation bent on total war. Life and prosperity are threatened. The lightweights and fools are no longer entertaining but dangerous and expendable. It is time for serious people to call a spade a spade and a fool a fool. Here are some personal favorites.

The collectivists at the New York Times are no better and not much worse than the empire lovers at National Review. The armchair generals in both editorial offices would have other people fight and die in a total war between their Empire of America and Islam. The very war the terrorists are trying to start. Fools.

The pampered pea brains in Hollywood and the tenured big brains in academia are equally clueless. Both exist in cocoons of unreality; one of fiction the other of theories stranger than fiction. The next time Streisand or a Baldwin or Ethan Hawke (who?) expresses an opinion on anything more weighty than the gown Cher wore to their last self aggrandizing awards ceremony they should be conscripted into a USO troupe and sent off to entertain in the refugee camps along the Afghanistan - Pakistan border. And the only academics who should be allowed to express an opinion off campus are Camille Paglia and John Lott. The rest of them should be confined to their department offices where they can sip Chardonnay and let graduate students do their work for them. Lightweights.

Take a close look at our political leaders. John "Loose Cannon" McCain is not much less a fool than Barney Frank. Not enough to matter, anyway. And how much real difference is there between John Kerry and Tom Ridge, anyway? In their world, letting people keep their own money is spending while letting the government spend that money is investing. Foolish doubletalk. The governing class and their love of power and empire is, in large part, what got us into our current situation. Let’s not forget the damage done by these lightweights once it is all over. OK?

Then there is Allen Greenspan and his Fed loving groupies. With a once, if artificially, sizzling economy teetering on the brink of a corrective recession they want to bail out every failing business in the U.S. and every failing region on the earth. With the habit of saving nearly squeezed out of us they continue to print money, making what savings we have worth less and making the very concept of saving suspect. Good thinking, boys.

Speaking of fools, Teddy Kennedy. ‘Nuff said.

In his day, Bill Clinton was Lightweight Prime. A grifter from the sticks who flimflammed his way onto the big stage. A man with no core beliefs beyond really liking the job of President and really wanting to keep it. When an American embassy or an American ship or high rise buildings sheltering Americans got bombed, and all got bombed during his watch, his response was to stage a TV special. Launch missiles. Blow something up. Pretty much anything. He usually did it by night because the exhaust trails and the explosions looked so much cooler on CNN that way. Clinton was a lightweight in the ring with heavyweights. They recognized that he was not a serious man. That led them to conclude that America is not a serious country, Americans not serious people. It led them to conclude that we are all lightweights. The bill has come due for electing and reelecting a lightweight. For being influenced by a fool.

Dismantling the Second Amendment is a favorite of lightweights. You don’t need weapons, they have told us for years. You might hurt yourselves. Or hurt the children. Let Nanny State take care of you. Too many people listened. Still do. They bought into the statist vision of a utopia where guns are made to disappear and where there were no evil people. Fools. It does not work out that way and it does not work precisely because it is a lightweight idea that ignores the real world. Serious people know that we are each charged with our own self-defense, the defense of our families, our friends and our communities in this life. It is part of the deal you enter into at birth. Turning that defense over to someone else, especially a state, is irresponsible.

Where good people are unarmed bad guys win with box cutters. A few armed citizens could have stopped the terrorists just as armed citizens stop domestic bad guys every day. If the next terrorist attack is stopped that is likely who will stop it. That lesson should not be lost. Only fools go through life expecting someone else to protect them. If you are really interested in homeland security, support the Second Amendment and exercise your Second Amendment rights. Today. It is time for America to stop being influenced by lightweights like Chuck "Where’s the Camera?" Schumer, Sarah Brady and the Million Foolish Moms.

And not all fools are white. You can be dark skinned and be a lightweight. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are two truly breathtaking fools to whom America has given way too much attention for altogether too long a time. I like to imagine them ending their days touring in all black repertory company of "The Odd Couple," forever bickering about top billing. It makes me smile.

Jesse says the Taliban asked him to come talk to them so that he could help bring an end to the current tensions. The Taliban says, "Jesse who?" and I know which one I believe. It takes a lot in post 9/11 America to be less credible than the Taliban. Leave it to Jesse, the man who got rich by helping poor people. Makes you wonder where Mother Teresa went wrong. If it weren’t for Al Sharpton, Jesse would be the most transparent fraud in America.

A few days ago, Al Sharpton told us he gave Rudy Giuliani no credit, saying that New Yorkers, "would have come together if Bozo was the mayor." Do you think that was a trial balloon for his own candidacy? It does set a standard by which he is qualified. Big Al overflows with the milk of human kindness. Now he is worried about the civil rights of Arabs. Yeah, I believe that Al Sharpton cares about Arabs. Don’t you? He cares about Arabs like he cares about Jews and whites and, for that matter, other blacks. Like he cared about Tawana Brawley. He cares about how they can contribute to the level of media attention to which he has become accustomed. We just don’t have time for this pair of fools anymore.

Ted Kennedy. ‘Nuff said.

Neither the NAACP nor the KKK has had an original thought in thirty years and both should be considered irrelevant due to their extreme foolishness. Most Americans are past the whole discrimination based on race thing and have been for years. There is opportunity in America for anyone willing to do the work it takes to excel. Anyone. That’s as good as it gets in this life. Meanwhile, these fools try to keep alive a past that is dead and gone. One does it to foster their entitlement agenda and the other the fear of that agenda. Get over it, fellas. We have.

Hillary Clinton is likewise a lightweight, a foolish and petulant prima donna. Her performance during President Bush’s address to the nation should have proven it to everyone once and for all. My daughter knew better than to behave that way when she was four. Her staff says she was tired. Poor thing. And Hillary, the junior lightweight from New York, says she knows what it is like to look terrorism in the face because of what she went through during her attempted coup of our healthcare system. Talk radio was mean and people said rude things. Idiot.

Animal rights, PETA and that bunch, is another stupid idea whose time to go has come. Listen up, people have rights - not animals. I love my little dogs. I feed the birds. I’ve been known to stop my car to move a turtle off the road in my time. But one person is worth more than all the animals that ever were and it’s time to tell the fools who say otherwise to take a walk. Risking people to save animals and considering it a good bargain is as lightweight as it gets.

Their brother lightweights, the enviro-socialists, likewise devalue human life. And I am not talking only about the clearly radical groups like the Earth Liberation Front but also the seemingly more reputable, Sierra Club class environmental whackos. Lightweight thinkers all. Not one person should

go a night without home heating oil so that a caribou has a nice tundra to roam. Sacrificing the prosperity that improves the lot in life of real people for the sake of a butterfly is dumb with a capital duh. Sacrificing firefighters because fish need the water is criminal. Members of these extreme environmental movements have been guilty of causing pain and loss and practicing terrorism. Of course, none of it elicits condemnation form the lightweights in the establishment media. More fools.

I am reminded of the great line in "Treasure of the Sierra Madre." Realizing that he is standing in the midst of the fortune he has been seeking without knowing it, the old prospector tells Fred C. Dobbs, "You’re so stupid there’s nothing to compare you to." Ted Kennedy. ‘Nuff said.

The list of fools and foolish ideas we have put up with seems endless. The feminized military with co-ed barracks and pregnant grunts kind of redefines gunner’s mate, huh? The condemnation of the Boy Scouts because they refuse to tell eleven year old boys to sleep in tents with men who want to sleep with eleven year old boys would be ludicrous if not for the fact that it is so utterly reprehensible. The characterization of simple good police work as "racial profiling," is classic lightweight thinking as is the idea of additional punishment for "hate crimes" as if there were some other kind. Does it ever end? It had better.

We have let it go on too long. It is time to be serious, to think seriously. It is time to defend the core American value of liberty and oppose anything - anything - that threatens it. Time to speak truth to power, including the power of public opinion. Time to toss the lightweights, their lightweight ideas and the whole lightweight culture out on their collective ear. Time to stop being influenced by fools.

October 8, 2001

Ed Cobb [send him mail] is a printer in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley. He is a northerner by birth, a southerner by choice, and a Catholic by the grace of God.

lewrockwell.com



To: gao seng who wrote (191323)10/12/2001 9:13:03 AM
From: gao seng  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 769668
 
PEGGY NOONAN

Welcome Back, Duke
From the ashes of Sept. 11 arise the manly virtues.

Friday, October 12, 2001 12:01 a.m. EDT

A few weeks ago I wrote a column called "God Is Back," about how, within a day of the events of Sept. 11, my city was awash in religious imagery--prayer cards, statues of saints. It all culminated, in a way, in the discovery of the steel-girder cross that emerged last week from the wreckage--unbent, unbroken, unmelted, perfectly proportioned and duly blessed by a Catholic friar on the request of the rescue workers, who seemed to see meaning in the cross's existence. So do I.

My son, a teenager, finds this hilarious, as does one of my best friends. They have teased me, to my delight, but I have told them, "Boys, this whole story is about good and evil, about the clash of good and evil." If you are of a certain cast of mind, it is of course meaningful that the face of the Evil One seemed to emerge with a roar from the furnace that was Tower One. You have seen the Associated Press photo, and the photos that followed: the evil face roared out of the building with an ugly howl--and then in a snap of the fingers it lost form and force and disappeared. If you are of a certain cast of mind it is of course meaningful that the cross, which to those of its faith is imperishable, did not disappear. It was not crushed by the millions of tons of concrete that crashed down upon it, did not melt in the furnace. It rose from the rubble, still there, intact.

For the ignorant, the superstitious and me (and maybe you), the face of the Evil One was revealed, and died; for the ignorant, the superstitious and me (and maybe you), the cross survived. This is how God speaks to us. He is saying, "I am." He is saying, "I am here." He is saying, "And the force of all the evil of all the world will not bury me."

I believe this quite literally. But then I am experiencing Sept. 11 not as a political event but as a spiritual event.

And, of course, a cultural one, which gets me to my topic.

It is not only that God is back, but that men are back. A certain style of manliness is once again being honored and celebrated in our country since Sept. 11. You might say it suddenly emerged from the rubble of the past quarter century, and emerged when a certain kind of man came forth to get our great country out of the fix it was in.

I am speaking of masculine men, men who push things and pull things and haul things and build things, men who charge up the stairs in a hundred pounds of gear and tell everyone else where to go to be safe. Men who are welders, who do construction, men who are cops and firemen. They are all of them, one way or another, the men who put the fire out, the men who are digging the rubble out, and the men who will build whatever takes its place.

And their style is back in style. We are experiencing a new respect for their old-fashioned masculinity, a new respect for physical courage, for strength and for the willingness to use both for the good of others.

You didn't have to be a fireman to be one of the manly men of Sept. 11. Those businessmen on flight 93, which was supposed to hit Washington, the businessmen who didn't live by their hands or their backs but who found out what was happening to their country, said goodbye to the people they loved, snapped the cell phone shut and said, "Let's roll." Those were tough men, the ones who forced that plane down in Pennsylvania. They were tough, brave guys.



Let me tell you when I first realized what I'm saying. On Friday, Sept. 14, I went with friends down to the staging area on the West Side Highway where all the trucks filled with guys coming off a 12-hour shift at ground zero would pass by. They were tough, rough men, the grunts of the city--construction workers and electrical workers and cops and emergency medical worker and firemen.
I joined a group that was just standing there as the truck convoys went by. And all we did was cheer. We all wanted to do some kind of volunteer work but there was nothing left to do, so we stood and cheered those who were doing. The trucks would go by and we'd cheer and wave and shout "God bless you!" and "We love you!" We waved flags and signs, clapped and threw kisses, and we meant it: We loved these men. And as the workers would go by--they would wave to us from their trucks and buses, and smile and nod--I realized that a lot of them were men who hadn't been applauded since the day they danced to their song with their bride at the wedding.

And suddenly I looked around me at all of us who were cheering. And saw who we were. Investment bankers! Orthodontists! Magazine editors! In my group, a lawyer, a columnist and a writer. We had been the kings and queens of the city, respected professional in a city that respects its professional class. And this night we were nobody. We were so useless, all we could do was applaud the somebodies, the workers who, unlike us, had not been applauded much in their lives.

And now they were saving our city.

I turned to my friend and said, "I have seen the grunts of New York become kings and queens of the City." I was so moved and, oddly I guess, grateful. Because they'd always been the people who ran the place, who kept it going, they'd just never been given their due. But now--"And the last shall be first"--we were making up for it.



It may seem that I am really talking about class--the professional classes have a new appreciation for the working class men of Lodi, N.J., or Astoria, Queens. But what I'm attempting to talk about is actual manliness, which often seems tied up with class issues, as they say, but isn't always by any means the same thing.
Here's what I'm trying to say: Once about 10 years ago there was a story--you might have read it in your local tabloid, or a supermarket tabloid like the National Enquirer--about an American man and woman who were on their honeymoon in Australia or New Zealand. They were swimming in the ocean, the water chest-high. From nowhere came a shark. The shark went straight for the woman, opened its jaws. Do you know what the man did? He punched the shark in the head. He punched it and punched it again. He did not do brilliant commentary on the shark, he did not share his sensitive feelings about the shark, he did not make wry observations about the shark, he punched the shark in the head. So the shark let go of his wife and went straight for him. And it killed him. The wife survived to tell the story of what her husband had done. He had tried to deck the shark. I told my friends: That's what a wonderful man is, a man who will try to deck the shark.

I don't know what the guy did for a living, but he had a very old-fashioned sense of what it is to be a man, and I think that sense is coming back into style because of who saved us on Sept. 11, and that is very good for our country.

Why? Well, manliness wins wars. Strength and guts plus brains and spirit wins wars. But also, you know what follows manliness? The gentleman. The return of manliness will bring a return of gentlemanliness, for a simple reason: masculine men are almost by definition gentlemen. Example: If you're a woman and you go to a faculty meeting at an Ivy League University you'll have to fight with a male intellectual for a chair, but I assure you that if you go to a Knights of Columbus Hall, the men inside (cops, firemen, insurance agents) will rise to offer you a seat. Because they are manly men, and gentlemen.

It is hard to be a man. I am certain of it; to be a man in this world is not easy. I know you are thinking, But it's not easy to be a woman, and you are so right. But women get to complain and make others feel bad about their plight. Men have to suck it up. Good men suck it up and remain good-natured, constructive and helpful; less-good men become the kind of men who are spoofed on "The Man Show"--babe-watching, dope-smoking nihilists. (Nihilism is not manly, it is the last refuge of sissies.)



I should discuss how manliness and its brother, gentlemanliness, went out of style. I know, because I was there. In fact, I may have done it. I remember exactly when: It was in the mid-'70s, and I was in my mid-20s, and a big, nice, middle-aged man got up from his seat to help me haul a big piece of luggage into the overhead luggage space on a plane. I was a feminist, and knew our rules and rants. "I can do it myself," I snapped.
It was important that he know women are strong. It was even more important, it turns out, that I know I was a jackass, but I didn't. I embarrassed a nice man who was attempting to help a lady. I wasn't lady enough to let him. I bet he never offered to help a lady again. I bet he became an intellectual, or a writer, and not a good man like a fireman or a businessman who says, "Let's roll."

But perhaps it wasn't just me. I was there in America, as a child, when John Wayne was a hero, and a symbol of American manliness. He was strong, and silent. And I was there in America when they killed John Wayne by a thousand cuts. A lot of people killed him--not only feminists but peaceniks, leftists, intellectuals, others. You could even say it was Woody Allen who did it, through laughter and an endearing admission of his own nervousness and fear. He made nervousness and fearfulness the admired style. He made not being able to deck the shark, but doing the funniest commentary on not decking the shark, seem . . . cool.

But when we killed John Wayne, you know who we were left with. We were left with John Wayne's friendly-antagonist sidekick in the old John Ford movies, Barry Fitzgerald. The small, nervous, gossiping neighborhood commentator Barry Fitzgerald, who wanted to talk about everything and do nothing.

This was not progress. It was not improvement.

I missed John Wayne.

But now I think . . . he's back. I think he returned on Sept. 11. I think he ran up the stairs, threw the kid over his back like a sack of potatoes, came back down and shoveled rubble. I think he's in Afghanistan now, saying, with his slow swagger and simmering silence, "Yer in a whole lotta trouble now, Osama-boy."

I think he's back in style. And none too soon.

Welcome back, Duke.

And once again: Thank you, men of Sept. 11.

Ms. Noonan is a contributing editor of The Wall Street Journal. Her new book, "When Character Was King: A Story of Ronald Reagan," will be published by Viking Penguin this fall. Her column appears Fridays.

opinionjournal.com