SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Shread who wrote (21539)10/12/2001 1:23:28 PM
From: John Carson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
Paul,

You are right dermal is not as bad as inhaled. Just the fact that anthrax has been detected on someone in midtown means anthrax has been released somewhere somehow close by. Inhaled anthrax produces flu like symptoms which show up one to two weeks after being inhaled, presence of dermal anthrax is detected by formation of skin rash that develops within a couple of days. The people who inhaled anthrax do not know it yet. Wait a week then post your e-mail again. You might get more than one person responding to it.

John



To: Paul Shread who wrote (21539)10/12/2001 1:27:20 PM
From: John Carson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
VIX up 5.26, 16.1% to 37.85. Apparently, market does not agree with you about dermal.



To: Paul Shread who wrote (21539)10/13/2001 10:01:29 AM
From: sq39  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
paul,

it is the same germ, just a case of whether it enters you
by skin or respiration!!!! the first they say is 25% lethal
the second 95%.
received info. from two different sites, did not want to
post the whole lengthy articles but can refind if you
desire to see them...