Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (2311)	10/12/2001 1:27:43 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 14610

the problem that I have is that they keep on saying that they have no reason to believe that it is related....BULLSHIT!. The mere fact that we have 4 cases of anthrax in the same timeframe as the WTC/Pent attacks is a pretty definitive connection....and they are making a big point that it is a different form of anthrax....SFW (that is a new acronym for "So What"). If somebody stole a whole bunch of anthrax at the same time, we would be on the look out for it. There was probably little bits stolen from different places over a long period of time so that nobody would notice. I am not really worried about the anthrax stuff. Like the plane attacks, I don't think that these will be effective in the future. To be delivered effectively, it has to be in a powder form. Now everyone will be looking out for that. And if caught soon enough, it can be treated. It just pisses me off that the gov is downplaying the possibility of a connection. but then again, if we say that this anthrax stuff is not connected to OBL, maybe it will force him to admit that it is. What good is terrorism unless the terrorist organization gets credit?