Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (191530)	10/12/2001 4:34:42 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

idiocy. good job finding those and making tiggerpuss a donkey's ass.......again.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (191530)	10/12/2001 4:48:10 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

I like that classic set. Indeed tiger is an animal. #reply-16073146 If a person has no self image, should we be able to "abort" them? (And never had a self image) And yes this is my premise. It is up to the women who has a self-image and a plan for the future to decide whether to continue to bring the pregnancy to the point that the baby may become self aware. The self awareness does not happen for a year or two after birth .... #reply-16069810 Self awareness sets humans apart, well humans and chimps and orangatangs all have it , but it is still an exclusive club. It's what christains used to equate with souls. What is human becomes a definition involving DNA or self awareness. A human baby does not possess the ability to recognize self at birth. All sorts of cells possess the DNA to become a human. A baby is not "human" until birth at least. #reply-16070741 Babies remember movement, sound and other senses. What they don't remember is a mental picture of themselves in context. It's the self image that makes a person a person and not an animal. .............. tom watson tosiwmee