Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (32261)	10/12/2001 7:57:10 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I never said one thing was a consequence of the other. I said that a person committing an evil action may not be evil, they may rather be mistaken. You are not reading your mail... I said: You said that whether you would call a person "evil" depends on if they were "mistaken"--which (of course) is a consequence of secular limitation, intelligence, etc. which means that "mistaken" is a consequence of limitation--NOT A CONSEQUENCE OF "EVIL". You said that their "evil" was dependent on your opinion of whether or not they were "mistaken". To you, the evil of the person is qualified by the judgement of Tim Fowler. This is slightly at odds with Absolutist doctrine! :-)