Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: szconfederate who wrote (78409)	10/14/2001 1:35:36 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

OK, here it is all,proof that parts of Islam might not be all that bad!: Islam Stoned by Richard S. Ehrlich Asia Correspondent KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia -- If President Clinton were a Moslem citizen of Malaysia, "he would be stoned to death" for adultery under a future government that the Islamic Party hopes people will elect. (cont) zolatimes.com

To: szconfederate who wrote (78409)	10/14/2001 6:52:01 AM
From: Rarebird	Respond to of 116759

Bush has become quite the radical liberal big spender since he became President. The Liberals in Congress love Bush. It is the conservatives in his own party that are flipping out. But that's Bush for you. He often says one thing but does quite the contrary. The guy is in the process of creating his own political grave. This country has now returned to FDR style big spending stimulus programs, programs that are well known to be nothing more than temporary fixes that peter out and need more infusions. As a radical liberal, I also like his Administration's massive education budget, the biggest in history. After all, "Big Brother" should try its best to make children succeed in school. There is lot more required for success in school than Federal spending though. Now what is this babble of yours about me calling Bush "a liar because he hadn't come through with a tax cut." I think you are the liar here. Can you reproduce that post?