SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (145276)10/14/2001 2:23:06 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer, Re: Nothing can compare with its commercial integer or scientific floating-point SPECcpu2000 performance. "

>>That's right, nothing can compare if you don't publish the scores. Problem is that despite their claim on their webpage they haven't published any SPEC scores. If we're comparing unpublished SPEC scores, I think Intel will have some pretty impressive numbers for McKinley next week and Northwood/Prestonia will be better as well. As it stands now, P4, with the smallest cache of any processor, posts the highest SPEC scores ever published.


I realize you're the champion of Intel SPEC scores, but either way, IBM is solidly behind Itanium. With the Intel 870 chipset, what IBM is doing, and what HP/CPQ is doing, Itanium won't be lacking for infrastructure support.

Tony



To: Elmer who wrote (145276)10/15/2001 8:22:33 AM
From: willcousa  Respond to of 186894
 
When it comes to unpublished scores the winner will be AMD. This is right up their alley.