SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (78479)10/15/2001 12:30:56 AM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753
 
Well it's either that (total conquest) or Jews and Arabs in radio tracking ankle bracelets.

Frankly between the official political lies and the religious rhetoric it look like no clear definable solution short of nuclear Armageddon.

Now I used to think, it's a good thing it's guys like me who had their finger on the nuclear trigger instead of dangerous dweebs like rarebird. But with the new world order I suddenly find that it's irrelevant. It may be that fundamentalists on both sides are really what is driving this dangerous polarization. Of course our enemies have to clearly define themselves as irreducibly opposed to us, and dangerous enough to justify total war, something that they have strived to hide for along time, semi successfully without gaining any real trust. But if things continue to drive us apart and trust is never there, then I would say it is inevitable. Total war between east and west will engulf the world. There is no middle ground between inflexible domains.

Once before we saw this in man's history. The problem was soluble. But there is no stand off today. No lines drawn in the sand mutually between equally dangerous forces. Only vague unease about the enemies dastardliness and intractibility. This is worse than the cold war. And more dangerous in that it makes a total war solution, while seemingly hard to justify and mobilize for, only ponderable because at the present time, and for not too many more years, it is winnable.

EC<:-}



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (78479)10/15/2001 7:11:25 AM
From: d:oug  Respond to of 116753
 
From A to Zeev" -- SI Sacks Zeev

Silicon Investor's Home Page

Hot StockTalk for Monday, 15 October 2001

1 Zeev's Turnips - No Politics
2 Wennerstrom Semi Equipment Analysis
3 Canadian-over $3.00 Stock-Picking Challenge
4 Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis
5 Orchid BioSciences, Inc ORCH
6 Stock Watcher's Thread / PIX OF THE WEEK (POW)
7 Defense Play in Motion - WTC Reaction
8 TC2000 Users Technical Analysis Forum
9 STOCKS FOR THE COMING CONFLICT
10 Zeev's Turnips

Congradulations Zeev,

d:o)ug