Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: isopatch who wrote (2835)	10/15/2001 11:13:23 AM
From: Roebear	Respond to of 36161

isopatch, I'll let Slider address the previous poster issue, lol! Very valid point on the ostentatious houses and lack of security. I know some of the more prominent houses that were built during the last real estate bubble that have been "knocked off" three times and this is a very low crime area with burglaries almost exclusively confined to those types of homes! The corrolary to the low crime rate is the local police consist of one sleepy part time gendarme. Was it Willy Sutton (sp?) who said he robbed banks because that is where the money is? It's even better with the money there and no police! High profile is not smart! One more thought on the rural real estate. Have noticed the new money landholders are not like the previous land holders. They are exclusive and do not interact with their neighbors. In a rural setting, your neighbors are your best and first line of security, especially if you only have a few. Which makes small country villages one of the most secure settings. Best Regards, Roebear