SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (145318)10/15/2001 5:24:46 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
<Pete, someone who finds no fault with "quantispeed" would be a hypocrite to criticize Intel's reporting of Pro Forma numbers.>

Athlon XP 1800+ beats the crap out of 2.0GHz P4. Just check the www.anandtech.com review. Shall we call 2.0GHz P4 the "phonyspeed" "gasburst" architecture?

Kap



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (145318)10/15/2001 10:03:13 PM
From: pgerassi  Respond to of 186894
 
Dear Tench:

I do wish that consumers would be able to understand clock == RPM, IPC == torque and Performance = clock * IPC == RPM * torque = HP. It would lead to a lot less confusion. However, I do think that high clock for Intel is even more misleading than Quantispeed. Basing Quantispeed on Tbird should be as allowable as Intel's own iCOMP rating. Forgot about that didn't you!

Pete


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News