SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (41066)10/16/2001 12:38:26 PM
From: Luce Wildebeest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
Distinguished historian Paul Johnson warns against relying on 'moderate' Muslim regimes

Editor's note: Historian and veteran journalist Paul Johnson is the author of, among many other books, "Modern Times," "Intellectuals" and "A History of the American People."

BOLD and uncompromising words were spoken by American (and British) leaders in the immediate response to the Manhattan Massacre. But they may be succeeded by creeping appeasement unless public opinion insists that these leaders stick to their initial resolve to destroy international terrorism completely. One central reason why appeasement is so tempting to Western governments is that attacking terrorism at its roots necessarily involves conflict with the second-largest religious community in the world. It is widely said that Islamic terrorists are wholly unorthodox in their belief that their religion sanctions what they do, and promises the reward of heaven to what we call "suicide bombers" but they insist are martyrs to the faith. This is bolstered by the assertion that Islam is essentially a religion of peace and that the very word "Islam" means "peace." Not so. Islam means "submission," a very different matter, and one of the functions of Islam, in its more militant aspect, is to obtain that submission from all, if necessary by force. Islam is an imperialist religion, more so than Christianity has ever been, and in contrast to Judaism. The Koran, Sura 5, verse 85, describes the inevitable enmity between Moslems and non-Moslems: "Strongest among men in enmity to the Believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans." Sura 9, verse 5, adds: "Then fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them. And seize them, beleaguer them and lie in wait for them, in every stratagem [of war]." Then nations, however mighty, the Koran insists, must be fought "until they embrace Islam." These canonical commands cannot be explained away or softened by modern theological exegesis, because there is no such science in Islam. Unlike Christianity, which, since the Reformation and Counter Reformation, has continually updated itself and adapted to changed conditions, and unlike Judaism, which has experienced what is called the 18th-century Jewish enlightenment, Islam remains a religion of the Dark Ages. The 7th-century Koran is still taught as the immutable word of God, any teaching of which is literally true. In other words, mainstream Islam is essentially akin to the most extreme form of Biblical fundamentalism. It is true it contains many sects and tendencies, quite apart from the broad division between Sunni Moslems, the majority, who are comparatively moderate and include most of the ruling families of the Gulf, and Shia Moslems, far more extreme, who dominate Iran. VIRTUALLY all these tendencies are more militant and uncompromising than the orthodox, which is moderate only by comparison, and by our own standards is extreme. It believes, for instance, in a theocratic state, ruled by religious law, inflicting (as in Saudi Arabia) grotesquely cruel punishments, which were becoming obsolete in Western Europe in the early Middle Ages. Moreover, Koranic teaching that the faith or "submission" can be, and in suitable circum stances must be, imposed by force, has never been ignored. The history of Islam has essentially been a history of conquest and re-conquest. The 7th-century "breakout" of Islam from Arabia was followed by the rapid conquest of North Africa, the invasion and virtual conquest of Spain, and a thrust into France that carried the crescent to the gates of Paris. It took half a millennium of re-conquer to expel the Moslems from Western Europe. THE Crusades, far from being an outrageous prototype of Western imperialism, as is taught in most schools, were a mere episode in a struggle that has lasted 1,400 years, and were one of the few occasions when Christians took the offensive to regain the "occupied territories" of the Holy Land. The Crusades, as it happened, fatally weakened the Greek Orthodox Byzantine Empire, the main barrier to the spread of Islam into southeast and central Europe. As a result of the fall of Constantinople to the ultra-militant Ottoman Sultans, Islam took over the entire Balkans, and was threatening to capture Vienna and move into the heart of Europe as recently as the 1680s. This millennial struggle continues in a variety of ways. The conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo were a savage reaction by the Orthodox Christians of Serbia to the spread of Islam in their historic heartlands, chiefly by virtue of a higher birthrate. Indeed, in the West, the battle is largely demographic, though it is likely to take a more militant turn at any moment. Moslems from the Balkans and North Africa are surging over established frontiers on a huge scale, rather as the pressure of the eastern tribes brought about the collapse of the Roman Empire of the West in the 4th and 5th centuries CE. The number of Moslems settling in Europe is now beyond computation, for most of them are illegals. They are getting into Spain and Italy in such numbers that, should present trends continue, both these traditionally Catholic countries will become majority Moslem during the 21st century. The West is not alone in being under threat from Is lslamic expansion. While the Ottomans moved into South-East Europe, the Moghul invasion of India destroyed much of Hindu and Buddhist civilization there. The recent destruction by Moslems in Afghanistan of colossal Buddhist statues is a reminder of what happened to temples and shrines, on an enormous scale, when Islam took over. The writer V. S. Naipaul has recently pointed out that the destructiveness of the Moslem Conquest is at the root of India's appalling poverty today. Indeed, the historical record shows that Moslem rule has tended both to promote and to perpetuate poverty. MEANWHILE, the religion of "submission" continues to advance, as a rule by force, in Africa in part of Nigeria and Sudan, and in Asia, notably in Indonesia, where non-Moslems are given the choice of conversion or death. And in all countries where Islamic law is applied, converts, whether compulsory or not, who revert to their earlier faith, are punished by death. The survival and expansion of militant Islam in the 20th century came as a surprise. After the First World War, many believed that Turkey, where the Kemal Ataturk regime imposed secularization by force, would set the pattern for the future, and that Islam would at last be reformed and modernized. Though secularism has - so far - survived in Turkey, in the rest of Islam fundamentalism, or orthodoxy, as it is more properly called, has increased its grip on both the rulers and the masses. There are at present 18 predominantly Islamic states, some of them under Koranic law and all ruled by groups that have good reason to fear extremists. HENCE American policymakers, in planning to uproot Islamic terrorism once and for all, have to steer a narrow path. They have the military power to do what they want, but they need a broad-based global coalition to back their action, preferably with military contributions as well as words, and ideally including such states as Pakistan, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. To get this kind of support is not easy, for moderate Moslem rulers are far more frightened of the terrorists than of Americans, and fear for their lives and families. The danger is that they will insist on qualification of American action that will amount, in effect, to appeasement, and that this in turn will divide and weaken both the administration and U.S. public opinion. It is vitally important that America stick to the essentials of its military response and carry it through relentlessly and thoroughly. Although only Britain can be guaranteed to back the White House in every contingency, it is better in the long run for America to act without many allies, or even alone, than to engage in a messy compromise dictated by nervousness and cowardice. That would be the worst of all solutions and would be certain to lead to more terrorism, in more places, and on an ever-increasing scale. Now is the ideal moment for the United States to use all its physical capacity to eliminate large-scale international terrorism. The cause is overwhelmingly just, the nation is united, the hopes of decent, law-abiding men and women everywhere go with American arms. Such a moment may never recur. THE great William Gladstone, in resisting terrorism, once used the phrase, "The resources of civilization are not yet exhausted." That is true today. Those resources are largely in American hands, and the nation - "the last, best hope of mankind" - has an overwhelming duty to use them with purposeful justification and to the full, in the defense of the lives, property, and freedom of all of us. This is the central point to keep in mind when the weasel words of cowardice and surrender are pronounced.

From the Oct. 15 issue of National Review.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (41066)10/17/2001 1:14:00 AM
From: BubbaFred  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
"The man to really fear is Ayman Zawahiri"

thetimes.co.uk

THURSDAY OCTOBER 11 2001

The man to really fear

BY RICHARD OWEN AND DANIEL MCGRORY

Western intelligence has known for years that the power behind al-Qaeda is not bin Laden but his deputy, Ayman Zawahiri. It is time to target him

President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt will offer support and sweet tea to a weary Tony Blair when they meet in Cairo today, assuring him that the Arab world’s most populous nation supports the attacks in Afghanistan. But he will also have a more covert message for the Prime Minister: that in focusing on Osama bin Laden and elevating him to the role of Public Enemy No 1, we are hunting for the wrong man.

He will also, no doubt, resist the temptation to say “we told you so”.

Since September 11, the name on everybody’s lips has been that of bin Laden, the gaunt, hollow eyed Saudi-born billionnaire whose holy war against America has made him the prime target in the “war against terror”. But the real brains behind the attacks on New York and Washington, indeed the mastermind of the entire Islamic terrorist campaign against The Great Satan is not bin Laden at all — but the man often described as his No 2, the Egyptian-born physician Ayman Mohammed Rabie Zawahiri.

What’s more, this has long been known not only to Egyptian intelligence, but in American and British intelligence circles as well. Long before most people had ever of bin Laden or al-Qaeda, the Egyptians were warning Britain and America that the real danger to the security of the West was the benign-looking, middle-aged paediatrician with impeccable manners from Cairo.

Zawahiri was top of the country’s wanted list, which was sent to London and Washington.But the the tip-off seems to have been filed and ignored. In 1991 intelligence chiefs in Cairo were appalled to learn that Zawahiri was on a fund-raising tour of the US.

The white beard was shaved off, the hair dyed, and he was wearing dark-rimmed spectacles as he visited mosques and community centres in Texas, California and in the shadow of the World Trade Centre in New York, collecting many thousands of dollars for widows and orphans in Afghanistan.

He shook hands at dinner parties with Arab millionaires who willingly opened their chequebooks, after which he slipped back to his office in Peshawar where he was already amassing the personnel he needed to carry out his design for an all-out holy war.

In recent days you will have seen a good deal of the doctor — the slightly hunched figure always found standing alongside bin Laden during their video broadcasts. The CIA has taken to calling Zawahiri “the warm-up man”, because he is always the one to speak first — and most eloquently — in their joint TV appearances. In their most recent video, it was Zawahiri who was handed the microphone first and it was he who made sure that the tape was sent to the Qatari satellite television station, al-Jazeera, with orders to play it to the world the moment that the bombing started.

While bin Laden, as always, launched into a medieval rant against the Infidel, it was alZawahiri who wounded Americans by taunting them to ask themselves why the Muslim world detests them and wishes them more harm.

His ubiquitous presence whenever bin Laden is around is, say intelligence chiefs, al-Qaeda’s way of showing the West that their organisation is not reliant on just one man.

“Kill bin Laden or capture him and the message to us is that his loyal No 2 will carry on the fight with even more sympathisers,” a senior US security officer said yesterday.

Bin Laden’s face may be the one that Americans are taping over targets in their shooting ranges, but the Egyptians have been in no doubt for years that bin Laden’s personal physician and closest confidante is the mastermind for its most hideous atrocities. Zawahiri realised long ago that if you strike at Western targets — like bombing tourists on Nile cruises — the world soon takes notice.

In the shadow of the great Al-Azhar mosque in Cairo’s “Islamic quarter”, where the minarets of no fewer than 250 mosques pierce the skyline, they speak his name in a whisper.

But the intelligence community in Cairo is sure that Zawahiri’s “brilliant but twisted brain” is behind the US suicide attacks, part of a three-year plot to entice America into “a war with Islam”, intended to end in American withdrawal from the Middle East and the collapse of Israel. The roots of this terrorist network, in other words, lie not in Afghanistan’s mountains or even in Saudi Arabia but in Egypt.

On the face of it this seems absurd. Egypt, after all, is the very model of moderate Islam, a tourist destination, a place of belly-dancing, the treasures of Tutankhamun, the Pyramids and Nile cruises.

It is home to 87 million courteous and cultured Arabs proud of their history and hospitality. Once British-ruled (like Palestine and Jordan), Egypt still prides itself on its cosmopolitan outlook (the green lawns of the Cairo Sporting Club, once the domain of the British colonial elite, still dominate Zamalek island in the centre of Cairo).

Its political stability is personified by President Hosni Mubarak, the bluff, thickset former air-force pilot who has ruled Egypt since the assassination of President Anwar Sadat in 1981, and who together with King Abdullah of Jordan is a symbol of order and reason in the turbulent world of the Middle East.

But beneath this surface swirl the torrents of Islamic fundamentalism, which burst out now and then in attacks on Western tourists by groups such as al-Gamaa al-Islamiya and Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

Mubarak has survived as long as he has by suppressing them — for all his apparent tolerance — with unswerving ruthlessness. It was Egyptian Islamic Jihad, after all, which succeeded in murdering Sadat by dressing its killers in Egyptian army uniforms so they could infiltrate a military parade.

As they passed the presidential podium they turned their weapons on the man who had “betrayed Islam” by daring to make peace with Israel in 1979.

What few realised at the time — though we certainly know now — was that the man behind the murder, indeed the man behind Egyptian Islamic Jihad itself, was Zawahiri. He was arrested in the police crackdown which followed, but only on a technical charge of illegal possession of weapons (a pistol). What has happened is that in the years since this debut he has transferred his activities to the global stage, conceiving the idea of a worldwide network of Islamic terrorists who would “bring America to its knees”.

“He is the ideologue of Islamic terror, but also its organiser,” one diplomat in Cairo said.

If the roots of Osama bin Laden’s pathological hatred of America lie in his desire to see US forces expelled from the Gulf, there can be little doubt that the source of Zawahiri’s obsession lies in Egypt.

Mubarak has largely kept the lid on unrest, and there have been few overt signs of terrorism inside Egypt itself since an attack on tourists at Luxor in 1997. But if Egyptian Islamic terrorism has been successfully exported by Zawahiri, counter-terrorism experts warn, it could equally well be “re-imported”, especially if there are street protests in Egypt against US and British actions in Afghanistan. Islamic Jihad, though dormant, is still a force to be reckoned with in the poverty-stricken breeding grounds of militancy in Egypt.

It was from Zawahiri’s old university at Cairo where at least one of the suicide pilots in the September 11 attacks was recruited. Mohammed Atta, the hijack leader with the piercing eyes, was a member of Egyptian Islamic Jihad and one of Zawahiri’s hand-picked men.

Like so many of the modern breed of terrorist, Zawahiri did not come from a poor background. On the contrary, he was born in 1951 to a well-off middle-class family with a strong professional as well as religious background. His grandfather was Grand Imam at Al-Azhar University (which still stands next to the mosque of the same name), the foremost seat of learning for the Sunni branch of Islam.

A great uncle was the first Secretary-General of the Arab League, while Zawahiri’s father was a professor of pharmacology who died six years ago.

The young Zawahiri graduated in 1974 from the medical faculty at Cairo University, where his father taught and he appeared destined for a comfortable career as a paediatrician.

What stopped him was his fascination with radical politics.

From his teenage years he was intoxicated by the fervour of the Muslim Brotherhood (Al-Ikhwan Al-Moslemoon), the prototype of all Islamic militant organations. This was founded in 1928 with the aim of “purging” Egypt of “foreigners” which in reality meant the British.

At the age of 15 he was arrested for membership of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was banned in post-colonial Egypt — and still is — just as it had been under British rule.

But Zawahiri was critical of the Muslim Brotherhood’s shortcomings, castigating its failure to overthrow Egypt’s secular and “corrupt” regime in a book called The Bitter Harvest. By the late 1970s, according to Janes Intelligence Review, he had taken over Islamic Jihad as a more likely veh for an Islamic revolution. It was at this point, it seems that Zawahiri’s audacity and capacity to “think the unthinkable” came to the fore, with the plot to murder Sadat.

Medicine was forgotten: mission and megolamania had taken over.

After serving three years in prison in the wake of the Sadat assassination, he was released and left Egypt for Saudi Arabia and then Pakistan, joining the thousands of “Afghan Arabs” who flocked to Peshawar to help the Afghan resistance to fight the Russians after the Soviet invasion of 1979 — one of many, in fact, who after forcing the Russians out turned on the “other superpower” even though the US had covertly helped them in their anti-Soviet campaign. Zawahari soon became adept at using false passports (another feature of the September 11 plot), masquerading at various times as an Arab with Swiss, French or Dutch citizenship. He got to know his enemy at first hand by living in Western Europe and the US.

The substantial funds he raised for Islamic charities were in fact used to finance one of his first “global” attacks, the suicide bombing of the Egyptian Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan, in November 1995, in which 17 people died.

It should have been picked up as a warning of things to come — the use of fanatics prepared to die, the targeting of two countries at once, Egypt and Pakistan — but was not.

Nor was the crucial move three years later, when Zawahiri teamed up with Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan in February 1998, going on to create a broad grouping of Islamic terrorists under the umbrella of the International Front for Fighting Jews and Crusaders — a name which sounds fanciful to Western ears but has resonance in the Arab world. They also formed al-Qaeda as their core “military network”.

Left to himself, counter-terrorism experts say, Osama bin Laden might have confined himself to a “local” campaign to rid the Gulf of US forces or to topple the Saudi monarchy. It was Zawahiri who in 1998 had the “apocalyptic vision” to weld disparate Islamic terrorist groups into a force able to take on the mighty United States and once again to “think the unthinkable” — in this case the use of suicide pilots to crash into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, and perhaps the use of biological and chemical warfare in US cities.

When terrorists bombed the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998, six months after the fateful bin Laden-Zawahiri merger, and President Clinton launched cruise missile attacks on al-Qaeda’s training camps in Afghanistan, it was Zawahiri who responded by declaring: “The war has started. Now the Americans should wait for our answer.”

It was he, intelligence analysts now believe, who crafted the February 1998 “fatwa” issued by himself and Osama bin Laden ordering Muslims to kill Americans — including civilians — anywhere in the world, adding: “. . . with God’s help we call on every Muslim who wishes to be rewarded to comply with God’s order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it.”

When a video of Osama bin Laden was released a year ago after the suicide bombing of the USS Cole at Aden, it was again Zawahiri who took centre stage, declaring on camera: “Enough of words — it is time to take action against this iniquitous and faithless force (the US) which has sent its troops all over Egypt, Yemen and Saudi Arabia”.

In the latest video footage, Zawahiri is seen placing deliberate and repeated emphasis on the “sufferings of our Palestinian brothers”, a clear attempt to stoke up anti-Israeli sentiment on “the Arab street”. Egyptian officials say they have been “trying for years” to warn that terrorism rooted in the Middle East, and particularly in Egypt, would eventually strike at the West on its own soil. Zawahiri, they say, has been sentenced to death in absentia in the Egyptian courts, and is on Interpol’s “most wanted” list, yet has never been tracked down.

Nobody can know for sure what other audacious schemes he has up his sleeve, but few in Cairo doubt that his aim is not only to humble the West but also — and crucially — to impose an Islamic state in his native Egypt, succeeding where the Muslim Brotherhood failed in his youth. Asked a few years ago if he will ever return to Egypt and abandon his struggle, the doctor smiled and said: “I will be back only as a conqueror. I don’t accept going back in return for giving up my idea of jihad.“

The Zawahiri dossier

1951 Ayman Zawahiri was born into a well-off, respectable Egyptian family. His grandfather was an influential academic at Al-Azhar University, and his father a respected professor of pharmacology.

1960s Zawahiri became involved with militant Islamic groups, especially The Muslim Brotherhood, dedicated to expelling foreigners; aged 15, he was arrested for his membership.

1970s Graduated in 1974 and began a career as a paediatrician.

1978 As leader of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad movement, he was involved in the plot to murder President Anwar Sadat.

1981 After Sadat’s assassination, Zawahiri was imprisoned for three years on a minor firearms charge.

1984 Zawahiri left Egypt to join the Mujahidin in fighting the Russians. During this campaign he met Osama bin Laden.

1998 Zawahiri and bin Laden planned the bombings of US embassies in East Africa, under their umbrella organisation The International Front for Fighting Jews and Crusaders.

2001 Zawahiri’s daughter marries bin Laden’s son. He is now bin Laden’s friend, confidant and personal physician.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (41066)10/17/2001 1:17:09 AM
From: BubbaFred  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 50167
 
Bin Laden May Be Planning to Run

dailynews.yahoo.com

By JOHN J. LUMPKIN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) uses misdirection, look-alike decoys and fake caravans to foil pursuit. He is thought to have moved around Afghanistan (news - web sites) hidden in an ambulance.

U.S. intelligence officials believe bin Laden has remained in Taliban-controlled areas of Afghanistan since Sept. 11, the day jetliner hijackers allegedly sent by bin Laden attacked the United States. The officials are worried now, however, that bin Laden may be planning to leave for Chechnya (news - web sites), Somalia or Sudan - all war-torn, relatively lawless areas like Afghanistan where he can again hide.

His mobility is both a defense and a vulnerability, said Sen. Richard Shelby (news - bio - voting record), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

``If he's moving from post to post, place to place, cave to cave, town to town, sooner or later, we're going to find him,'' said Shelby, R-Ala.

Sen. Bob Graham (news - bio - voting record), the committee's chairman, said this week that he has information that makes him confident bin Laden will be found and captured or killed before mid-November. Like Shelby, the Florida Democrat receives classified briefings from U.S. intelligence agencies.

``I am confident we will able to locate and take - as a prisoner or through death - bin Laden,'' Graham said.

In general, bin Laden is believed to move frequently among his al-Qaida terrorist camps and deep caves honeycombing the mountain ranges that crisscross Afghanistan. He's usually with one or more of his wives, sometimes with some senior lieutenants, always with a security force. He normally stays out of cities and away from the Taliban's front lines with the rebels of the northern alliance.

If he has held to those routines, bin Laden probably is in southern or eastern Afghanistan, where the Taliban's hold is strongest. Most of his camps - many the targets of U.S. airstrikes - are in that region, although they have largely emptied since the terror attacks in New York and Washington.

Bin Laden could try to sneak across a border, although the possibility exists he could try to fly out, despite danger from airstrikes.

As the hunt for the No. 1 terror suspects continues, U.S. officials won't say for the record whether they believe bin Laden is moving or has hunkered down in one location for the past five weeks.

A Pakistani intelligence official said bin Laden moved within hours of Oct. 7 onset of attacks, but President Pervez Musharraf said this week his country does not know precisely where bin Laden is.

A British newspaper quoted bin Laden's 18-year-old son as saying his father took 300 fighters and satellite communications equipment into the mountains, where he would hide in a cave and direct fighting against both Western commandos and Afghanistan's northern alliance.

U.S. intelligence agencies have had a bead on bin Laden at least twice in recent years. After two U.S. embassies were bombed in Africa, the Clinton administration retaliated with a missile attack in August 1998, sending Tomahawk cruise missiles into his eastern Afghanistan training camps.

The U.S. attacks killed about 20 followers but reportedly missed bin Laden by a few hours.

During President Clinton (news - web sites)'s final days in office, senior officials again weighed a military strike after receiving intelligence on bin Laden's whereabouts. The plan was rejected over fears the information was stale and could result in a miss or civilian casualties.

Information from human sources - Afghan refugees or agents within the Taliban - will be key to finding bin Laden, said Steven Aftergood, an intelligence expert with the Federation of American Scientists. The exiled Saudi knows that his satellite phones are tapped and is believed to have turned to couriers, preventing U.S. intelligence from listening in on his communications.

The northern alliance is looking for bin Laden, too, said Haron Amin, the group's envoy to the United States. Bin Laden is believed to have organized the assassination of the alliance's military leader in the days before the Sept. 11 attacks.

``He is not going to be able to cross our front lines,'' Amin said. But he could run toward his supporters in Pakistan, sneaking across the border, he said.