Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rich4eagle who wrote (192743)	10/16/2001 5:27:08 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

"please don't accuse me of things I know nothing about or have said nothing about" Here is the post that prompted the discussion that you were having. You were attacking the poster, who was attacking TP for the following: "I can't help it, I would have been glad if Limbaugh was gone because he had lung cancer and was too ill to speak, but I will settle for deaf" - TigerPaw (that is an example of serious HATRED imo) I think the poster was justified in his attack on TP, you did not. I suggest you go back and read the posts that lead up to what you are responding to instead of just responding. I will accept your defense that you did not know that this was said. I guess you were just attacking the poster because he was attacking TP. It would be foolish imo to offer blanket immunity to him. His views are RADICAL imo. On your other point: I only bash Clinton when he is brought up in a positive way by one of the dems. Many question Bush's integrity and stick up for Clinton's. I think that is hypocritical, and like to point it out. Also - I don't think you will ever find a post that ORIGINATES with me as anything other than topics for conversation that I think are interesting. I do attack back with a vengence though when others say something that is offensive to me. The ball is now back in your court. I would like an apology, but not holding my breath. Scott

To: rich4eagle who wrote (192743)	10/16/2001 5:40:17 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Here is the entire string for your review. Please point out again what a lame brain I am for my post. I am curious how you can make that "logic" work. I particularly like the part where you say to Ron BL "Your post is disgusting as you personally attack those who have different ideological positions as yours", which was in response to TP's gem below. To me, that looks like it is ok to wish lung cancer and death on someone, while being disgusted about it is not. I also like how you equate wishing lung cancer and death to an "ideological position". TigerPaw I can't help it, I would have been glad if Limbaugh was gone because he had lung cancer and was too ill to speak, but I will settle for deaf. The world is going to be a better place the more gone he is. TP RON BL's response Tiger one day you will mouth off to the wrong person and make no mistake about it you will. Your too stupid to restrain yourself. On that day you will get what you deserve. Its been safe for slime like you to hate America and attempt to bring about its destruction. But those days are ending. It must make you squirm to see Bush with poll numbers that Clinton could never dream of. Go crawl back into your slime infested bath house or whatever place of garbage you reside in. Your response to RON BL Hey Ron cut the crap this is America let freedom ring, you want repression of thought and oppression. Your post is disgusting as you personally attack those who have different ideological positions as yours. Your posts violate the objective of the Consitution so much that it is myopic that you want to repress any thought but ultra consevative. Open your mind and accept the views of all and respect them or you are no better than the terrorists My response to you Just went back to read the posts that prompted this richie. Free speech is fine, but you are basically saying that TP is justified (and almost patriotic) to suggest that it would be nice of Limbaugh had lung cancer. You are also saying that someone who says that is out of line wants "repression of thought and oppression". In so doing you look like an idiot imo. And I am for free speech, but when one side says something so vile and divisive it is ok for the other side to say what they think too. Your response back to me Wait a minute, there you go again, as your hero would say. Limbaugh, lung cancer huh, last I heard he was going deaf, please don't accuse me of things I know nothing about or have said nothing about. As for vile and devisive speech you guys have done it in one continuous stream for the whole Clinton term and now that he is gone and there is nothing to gloat about that is good in this dismal start for Bush, you all again are on the vile and devisive bash Clinton stuff. And then you make some way off association about rush limbaugh and TP and what is proper, you guys need a major mouthwash. I never have attacked Bush for having drunken daughters or being some drunken party animal in his past and I won't. You folks searched for all the little dirt you could get on Clinton and are still doing so and will until something good comes out of this Admin. The ball is in your court play fair and respectful or get what you deserve