Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (5694)	10/16/2001 8:46:12 PM
From: Songwrks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Bio/Chem specialists testified at the White House on Sept. 10, 2001..Apparently, Stanford authorities as well as other national specialists were summoned to give all their information on how bio-chem weapons affect the human organism. They were shocked to realize that the "client" who wanted all this information was the US government. I can't quote a source here. It was told to me by a friend whose friend was one of the researchers called to the White House. So, did the White House already know something was coming? ~Jen

To: Thomas M. who wrote (5694)	10/16/2001 9:38:23 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 281500

So Thomas... do you believe that the US applying pressure upon Afghanistan to make them give up Bin Laden over the Africa Embassy bombings justified targeting 50,000 innocent civilians? After all, we have public evidence from Bin Laden's men that he orchestrated those bombings, and he is under a US Federal indictment in that matter. Furthermore, there is evidence of his complicity in the USS Cole bombing. So what price should be paid by those who harbor terrorists? Doesn't that make them an accessory to the crime if it was orchestrated from their country? This is interesting information, but does it alter the analysis? I don't think so... after all, HE DECLARED WAR UPON THE US, not the other way around. Hawk