Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (33519)	10/17/2001 1:04:48 AM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

See what happens when you wait too long between posting? You come out all het up and slinging. As to spitting... tacky and pointless and mis-directed. But a jailin' offence? In America? Hey, why not just beat some dude for not clipping his beard.

To: gao seng who wrote (33519)	10/17/2001 1:23:55 AM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You seem to love the law - maybe should learn something about these terms you like to use. I married a lawyer so I don't need to. siliconinvestor.com You brought up the spitting on Vets and how it was wrong. You seem to imply that this is an idea of free speech to some (and I surmise it had something to with X since you were posting to her). Then your buddy Chris came up with this one: Message 16514689 to which you high fived Message 16514721 Now slander would have to be false accusations: dictionary.com I simply asked where X was talking about spitting on Vietnam Vets (I even said please). It was certainly a tangent from what she was saying: Message 16514820 That is what I was saying. Doesn't look like slander to my council. You should not play here if it gets you worked up like this.