Oh come on, Karen, we all know that Clinton is personally responsible for anything that goes wrong in this country. especially now that he's out of office.
In fact, here's further "proof" that he did nothing to protect the US from biological attack while in office:
REMARKS BY PRESIDENT CLINTON
ON KEEPING AMERICA SECURE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
January 22, 1999
National Academy of Sciences
Washington, D.C.
10:30 A.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Jamie, Dr. Lederberg, I'd like to thank you for your service in this and so many other ways. I would like to
thank Sandy Berger for many things, including indulging my nagging on this subject for the better part of six years now. I was so relieved that Dr.
Lederberg not very long ago -- well, last year -- brought a distinguished panel bioterrorism threat, because I then had experts to cite on my concern
and nobody thought I was just reading too many novels late at night.
Madame Attorney General, Secretary Shalala, Secretary Richardson, Director Witt, Deputy Secretary Hamre, Commandant of the Coast Guard and
our other military leaders who are here, Mr. Clarke, ladies and gentlemen. I'm delighted to be here to discuss this subject. With some trepidation,
Sandy Berger noted that Dr. Lederberg won a Nobel Prize at 33, and I was governor you can infer from that that I was not very good at chemistry and
biology.
But any democracy is imbued with the responsibility of ordinary citizens who do not have extraordinary expertise to meet the challenges of each new
age. And that is what we are all trying to do. Our country has always met the challenges of those who would do us harm. At the heart of our national
defense I have always believed is our attempt to live by our values -- democracy, freedom, equal opportunity. We are working hard to fulfill these
values at home. And we are working with nations around the world to advance them, to build a new era of interdependence where nations work
together -- not simply for peace and security, but also for better schools and health care, broader prosperity, a cleaner environment and a greater
involvement by citizens everywhere in shaping their own future.
In the struggle to defend our people and values and to advance them wherever possible, we confront threats both old and new -- open borders and
revolutions in technology have spread the message and the gifts of freedom but have also given new opportunities to freedom's enemies. Scientific
advances have opened the possibility of longer, better lives. They have also given the enemies of freedom new opportunities.
Last August, at Andrews Air Force Base, I grieved with the families of the brave Americans who lost their lives at our embassy in Kenya. They were in
Africa to promote the values America shares with friends of freedom everywhere -- and for that they were murdered by terrorists. So, too, were men
and women in Oklahoma City, at the World Trade Center, Khobar Towers, on Pan Am 103.
The United States has mounted an aggressive response to terrorism -- tightening security for our diplomats, our troops, our air travelers, improving our
ability to track terrorist activity, enhancing cooperation with other countries, strengthening sanctions on nations that support terrorists.
Since 1993, we have tripled funding for FBI anti-terrorist efforts. Our agents and prosecutors, with excellent support from our
intelligence agencies,
have done extraordinary work in tracking down perpetrators of terrorist acts and bringing them to justice. And as our air strikes against
Afghanistan --
or against the terrorist camps in Afghanistan -- last summer showed, we are prepared to use military force against terrorists who harm
our citizens. But
all of you know the fight against terrorism is far from over. And now, terrorists seek new tools of destruction.
Last May, at the Naval Academy commencement, I said terrorist and outlaw states are extending the world's fields of battle, from physical
space to
cyberspace, from our earth's vast bodies of water to the complex workings of our own human bodies. The enemies of peace realize they
cannot defeat
us with traditional military means. So they are working on two new forms of assault, which you've heard about today: cyber attacks on
our critical
computer systems, and attacks with weapons of mass destruction -- chemical, biological, potentially even nuclear weapons. We must be
ready -- ready
if our adversaries try to use computers to disable power grids, banking, communications and transportation networks, police, fire and
health services --
or military assets.
More and more, these critical systems are driven by, and linked together with, computers, making them more vulnerable to disruption. Last spring, we
saw the enormous impact of a single failed electronic link, when a satellite malfunctioned -- disabled pagers, ATMs, credit card systems and television
networks all around the world. And we already are seeing the first wave of deliberate cyber attacks -- hackers break into government and business
computers, stealing and destroying information, raiding bank accounts, running up credit card charges, extorting money by threats to unleash computer
viruses.
The potential for harm is clear. Earlier this month, an ice storm in this area crippled power systems, plunging whole communities into darkness and
disrupting daily lives. We have to be ready for adversaries to launch attacks that could paralyze utilities and services across entire regions. We must be
ready if adversaries seek to attack with weapons of mass destruction, as well. Armed with these weapons, which can be compact and
inexpensive, a
small band of terrorists could inflict tremendous harm. Four years ago, though, the world received a wake-up call when a group unleashed
a deadly
chemical weapon, nerve gas, in the Tokyo subway. We have to be ready for the possibility that such a group will obtain biological
weapons. We have
to be ready to detect and address a biological attack promptly, before the disease spreads. If we prepare to defend against these
emerging threats we
will show terrorists that assaults on America will accomplish nothing but their own downfall.
Let me say first what we have done so far to meet this challenge. We've been working to create and strengthen the agreement to keep nations from
acquiring weapons of mass destruction, because this can help keep these weapons away from terrorists, as well. We're working to ensure the
effective
implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention; to obtain an accord that will strengthen compliance with the biological weapons
convention; to
end production of nuclear weapons material. We must ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to end nuclear tests once and for all.
As I proposed Tuesday in the State of the Union Address, we should substantially increase our efforts to help Russia and other former
Soviet nations
prevent weapons material and knowledge from falling into the hands of terrorists and outlaw states. In no small measure we should do
this by continuing
to expand our cooperative work with the thousands of Russian scientists who can be used to advance the causes of world peace and
health and
well-being, but who if they are not paid, remain a fertile field for the designs of terrorists.
But we cannot rely solely on our efforts to keep weapons from spreading. We have to be ready to act if they do spread. Last year, I obtained from
Congress a 39 percent budget increase for chemical and biological weapons preparedness. This is helping to accelerate our ongoing
effort to train and
equip fire, police and public health personnel all across our country to deal with chemical and biological emergencies. It is helping us to
ready armed
forces and National Guard units in every region to meet this challenge; and to improve our capacity to detect an outbreak of disease and
save lives; to
create the first ever civilian stockpile of medicines to treat people exposed to biological and chemical hazards; to increase research and
development on
new medicines and vaccines to deal with new threats.
Our commitment to give local communities the necessary tools already goes beyond paper and plans. For example, parked just outside this building is a
newly designed truck we have provided to the Arlington, Virginia, Fire Department. It can rapidly assist and prevent harm to people exposed to
chemical and biological dangers.
But our commitment on the cyber front has been strong, as well. We've created special offices within the FBI and the Commerce Department
to
protect critical systems against cyber attack. We're building partnerships with the private sector to find and reduce vulnerabilities; to
improve warning
systems; to rapidly recover if attacks occur. We have an outstanding public servant in Richard Clarke, who is coordinating all these efforts across
our
government.
Today, I want to announce the new initiatives we will take, to take us to the next level in preparing for these emerging threats. In my budget, I will ask
Congress for $10 billion to address terrorism and terrorist-emerging tools. This will include nearly $1.4 billion to protect citizens against
chemical and
biological terror -- more than double what we spent on such programs only two years ago.
We will speed and broaden our efforts, creating new local emergency medical teams, employing in the field portable detection units the size of a shoe
box to rapidly identify hazards; tying regional laboratories together for prompt analysis of biological threats. We will greatly accelerate research and
development, centered in the Department of Health and Human Services, for new vaccines, medicines and diagnostic tools.
I should say here that I know everybody in this crowd understands this, but everyone in America must understand this: the government has got to fund
this. There is no market for the kinds of things we need to develop; and if we are successful, there never will be a market for them. But we have got to
do our best to develop them. These cutting-edge efforts will address not only the threat of weapons of mass destruction, but also the equally serious
danger of emerging infectious diseases. So we will benefit even if we are successful in avoiding these attacks.
The budget proposal will also include $1.46 billion to protect critical systems from cyber and other attacks. That's 40 percent more than
we were
spending two years ago. Among other things, it will help to fund four new initiatives. First, an intensive research effort to detect intruders trying
to break
into critical computer systems. Second, crime -- excuse me detection networks, first for our Defense Department, and later for other key agencies so
when one critical computer system is invaded, others will be alerted instantly. And we will urge the private sector to create similar structures.
Third, the creation of information centers in the private sector so that our industries can work together and with government to address cyber threats.
Finally, we'll ask for funding to bolster the government's ranks of highly skilled computer experts -- people capable of preventing and responding to
computer crises.
To implement this proposal, the Cyber Corps program, we will encourage federal agencies to train and retrain computer specialists, as well as recruiting
gifted young people out of college.
In all our battles, we will be aggressive. At the same time I want you to know that we will remain committed to uphold privacy rights and other
constitutional protections, as well as the proprietary rights of American businesses. It is essential that we do not undermine liberty in the name of liberty.
We can prevail over terrorism by drawing on the very best in our free society -- the skill and courage of our troops, the genius of our scientists and
engineers, the strength of our factory workers, the determination and talents of our public servants, the vision of leaders in every vital sector.
I have tried as hard as I can to create the right frame of mind in America for dealing with this. For too long the problem has been that not enough
has
been done to recognize the threat and deal with it. And we in government, frankly, weren't as well organized as we should have been for
too long. I do
not want the pendulum to swing the other way now, and for people to believe that every incident they read about in a novel or every
incident they see in
a thrilling movie is about to happen to them within the next 24 hours. What we are seeing here, as any military person in the audience can
tell you, is
nothing more than a repetition of weapons systems that goes back to the beginning of time. An offensive weapons system is developed, and it
takes
time to develop the defense. And then another offensive weapon is developed that overcomes that defense, and then another defense is built up -- as
surely as castles and moats held off people with spears and bows and arrows and riding horses, and the catapult was developed to overcome the castle
and the moat.
But because of the speed with which change is occurring in our society -- in computing technology, and particularly in the biological sciences -- we
have got to do everything we can to make sure that we close the gap between offense and defense to nothing, if possible. That is the challenge here.
We are doing everything we can, in ways that I can and in ways that cannot discuss, to try to stop people who would misuse chemical and
biological
capacity from getting that capacity. This is not a cause for panic -- it is a cause for serious, deliberate, disciplined, long-term concern.
And I am
absolutely convinced that if we maintain our clear purpose and our strength of will, we will prevail here. And thanks to so many of you in
this audience,
and your colleagues throughout the United States, and like-minded people throughout the world, we have better than a good chance of
success. But we
must be deliberate, and we must be aggressive. Thank you very much. |
