Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: velociraptor_ who wrote (36633)	10/17/2001 1:52:51 PM
From: Frederick Langford	Respond to of 37746

Agree Velo, this proforma thing is a joke. If they want to do anything to make this market more stable, they will stop allowing proforma. Fred

To: velociraptor_ who wrote (36633)	10/17/2001 1:53:41 PM
From: Schtoink!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37746

CRYP moving pending earnings Friday. nice ride.

To: velociraptor_ who wrote (36633)	10/18/2001 12:56:24 AM
From: milesofstyles	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37746

where do ya suppose that 200m is coming from? what does your balance sheet analysis tell about pro forma vs actual? and to what effect will it have on vrts? here's my guess... income stmt depr exp...d acc depr...c balance sheet stmt retained earnings...d intangible assets...c at current pace, i suspect vrts has 8 more qtrs of pro forma ahead of them, unless they 0 out the intangibles. vrts has been performing this function for 8 straight qtrs already. this is not hide the pickle now, accounting wise. the difference lies in how those purchases were made, debt vs shares imo for most companies. milesov