SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (33864)10/17/2001 9:02:39 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 82486
 
Many of the Taliban were the Mujahadin

The individuals where yes. My comment was that we never sold or gave weapons to the Taliban. Members of the Taliban before they joined the Taliban where not part of the Taliban.

I will agree that one practical effect of our efforts was to cause the Taliban to wind up with more weapons. But it also helped the Soviet Empire to collapse. If all the weapons we gave the Mujahadin or all of those weapons that are now in the hands of the Taliban where to disapear right now, it wouldn't effect things to much. The main benefit we would have is that we could use helicopters with less risk and our planes could fly lower but we have dominence in the air of Afghanistan even with the stingers. Most of the Taliban's weapons used to be Soviet weapons or weapons of the puppet Afghan government the the USSR tried to prop up.

Tim