SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Computer Learning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thecow who wrote (22867)10/17/2001 10:41:49 PM
From: Rick Faurot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110652
 
You are welcome and no need whatsoever to apologize.

I reiterate my suggestion to all the regular posters on this this thread to put this person on ignore and thus eliminate any further disruptions.



To: thecow who wrote (22867)10/17/2001 10:43:32 PM
From: Magnatizer  Respond to of 110652
 
TC

Keep it real man. Don't let Mr. Thinskin obtain his objective.

ht
Mag



To: thecow who wrote (22867)10/17/2001 10:52:15 PM
From: IngotWeTrust  Respond to of 110652
 
Yes, I'm here to learn and to share, why else do you think I showed up?

I've already said I appreciated the cookie management software post and am taking it to club tomorrow night. And I was and still am sincerely appreciative. And I'm sticking around.



To: thecow who wrote (22867)10/17/2001 11:20:41 PM
From: Gottfried  Respond to of 110652
 
tc, new Norton av defs dated 10/17 are available. I never thought I'd have to use 'ignore' on this thread. :)

Regards Gottfried



To: thecow who wrote (22867)10/18/2001 11:36:17 AM
From: PMS Witch  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 110652
 
Off topic ...

First, I want to say that I think you are doing a great job of heading COMPUTER LEARNING.

I believe that SI consists of two types of threads: co-operative and adversarial. I also believe COMPUTER LEARNING is a co-operative thread. Some other examples...

Subject 30287 Daily Story Corner
Subject 18946 Dream Machine
Subject 22462 Favorite Quotes
Subject 7983; LAUGHTER IS THE BEST MEDICINE
Subject 36860 SI Highlights
Subject 36542 Things That Amuse Me
Subject 20243 Car Nut Corner
Subject 22366 COMPUTER LEARNING
Subject 21817 Things That Annoy Me

There are many others, but I only follow these.

In most cases, visitors to these threads do not arrive armed, with a chip on their shoulder, and loaded for bear. Usually, they have discovered something and wish to share it. Even a few who are locked in serious combat on other threads lay down their swords and shields and engage in friendly conversation. (Although I'm sure it's hard for some.)

The adversarial threads serve a valid purpose too. Exposing one's opinions to the criticism of those who have taken opposing positions is an efficient way of discovering the weaknesses in one's arguments, and perhaps one's thinking and logic too. Also, it's a quick way of uncovering overlooked facts, as these are often provided to support what is said.

And for those days nothing goes right, the toast burns, and the boss chews you out, those threads provide an outlet for frustrations and irritations. They are a good place to practice behaviour, that in person, would lead to blood spilling or lawsuits. On slow days, they can also be entertaining too.

I believe you are correct in trying to maintain the friendly atmosphere on COMPUTER LEARNING. I also believe that you've done a good job of communicating your motives for discouraging behaviour which may harm the spirit of your thread. When a few people begin posting to COMPUTER LEARNING, they may carry with them a posting style developed on other threads which may seem inappropriate here. Since everyone has something of value to contribute, we, as COMPUTER LEARNING participants, should welcome them and as far as possible, make them feel so comfortable on this thread that they soon realize that an aggressive posting style is not necessary.

Again, thank-you for your time and effort on COMPUTER LEARNING.

Cheers, PW.

P.S.

Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be shredded in the cross-fire!



To: thecow who wrote (22867)10/19/2001 9:39:34 AM
From: Alex Molnar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110652
 
TC,

No apologies needed from you, you are the offended party.
You have taken this thread over under difficult circumstances, your contribution and direction is priceless!
Keep up the good work and your head high, you have taken the high road! We all know how to use the IGNORE THIS PERSON
on people, whose contribution is not desired.

Alex