Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (133014)	10/18/2001 1:20:53 AM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>your clueless! That's why I don't live in LODI California with all you other red necks.

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (133014)	10/18/2001 2:01:53 AM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 164684

Globalist Factions Set to Collide during UN Summit mvcf.com By Joel Skousen, August 27, 2000 During this crucial time, anyone who values American Constitutional sovereignty should become a close observer of the New World Order (NWO) battleground forming in New York at UN headquarters starting September 6th. Most conservatives think that everyone attending the Summit will all be working toward a unified sellout of national sovereignty. This is true only in part. It won’t be the key struggle, however. While all the participants will be in favor of the erosion of sovereign nationalities, the real issue will be who will control the New World Order as it becomes fully empowered. Anyone who thinks that democracy will rule in the NWO or is very naive. I doubt that these hotly contested power struggles are going to be made public. We will only be able to tell who wins based upon what kinds of new structural changes come out from the summit--or, more likely, by what changes don’t happen.. It is my opinion that the NWO is split into two major factions: 1) The European faction, closely aligned with Moscow via the Socialist International (an old Communist/socialist front), and 2) The US/UK faction (an alliance of the US moneyed powers with the Conservative Tories in the UK. Both factions are one-world socialists, but the US/UK faction controls all the financial and military levers of power--World Bank, IMF, BIS etc. The European faction controls the UN--which presently has no power except as the US/UK faction allows, owing to the veto powers they possess in the Security Council. That’s why the issue of veto powers is up for negotiations in this summit, as well as forming a world army and ratifying a host of dangerous treaties that are languishing in the legislatures of reluctant sovereign nations. I expect them to agree on all the issues except those that involve a change in power--control of the world monetary institutions, and the Security Council veto. The veto will go only when the US/UK powers that be have invented other internal ways of keeping the rag-tag mob of 160 nations from redistributing all the wealth of the world for their benefit. Even the NWO couldn’t survive a full and uncontrolled dose of raw democracy and raw socialist takings. US socialists still want Fabian-type socialism that maintains the illusion of private property and keeps people working. This, in turn, keeps feeding the social programs that keep the socialists in power. As Chuck Baldwin recently put it in his essay Ignoring the Greatest Threat, "With either a Gore or Bush administration, one thing will not change: America's continued march toward a global, New World Order. Both Bush and Gore are greatly influenced (even manipulated) by international interests. That is why both Bush and Gore support permanent MFN for Communist China, the IMF, the World Bank, etc. Both men primarily serve the interests of international conglomerates. Therefore, the journey toward globalism will continue no matter which man wins the White House this November." For background information on the current UN proposals, as well as for daily updates during the UN Summit, you may visit Tom DeWeese’s American Policy Center website at: americanpolicy.org