SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Books, Movies, Food, Wine, and Whatever -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (3351)10/18/2001 12:35:39 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 51701
 
Hi Karen,

Yes, I'm in agreement with you on the Kinsolver piece. She made her point elegantly and reasonably, though I disagree with its conclusion. She manages to express pacifism without the (IMO!) ditsy "all you need is love" stuff espoused by Alice Walker. Personally, I find that stuff dangerously and naively retro.

As for vengeance, I've been giving that a lot thought as well. The desire for vengeance is not something I feel in this case -- or ever, really. I've been trying to figure if it's gender-linked and have to say that given a number of very vocal women on SI calling for vengeance, it may not be. -g

And what exactly is vengeance? Is it an equivalent payback (an eye for an eye)? Must it be meted out in the same milieu as the original incident? Would US economic sanctions (including our no longer buying their oil) satisfy peoples' need for vengeance, or is only sated with blood?



To: Lane3 who wrote (3351)10/18/2001 6:05:58 PM
From: Constant Reader  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 51701
 
It seems to me that the current official policies of the United States do not reflect vengeance. Which policies, if any, do you think are vengeful rather than pragmatic and results-oriented?