Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (2795)	10/19/2001 2:29:15 PM
From: lbs1989	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4051

Dear G.T., I was writing to you as a possible way to bring the discussion to a timely conclusion. You have had some very definitive opinions and since you are so knowledgeable about the topic I thought a couple of documented "for instances" would get the ball rolling. I don't think I have had any "bad" advice yet. I thank you for your general game plan but I was interested in something more specific in terms of proof for the "allegations " of wrong doing on R.W.'s part. I belive the thread would like to move on to focusing again on its initiated purpose but I don't think we can or should sweep you allegations under the rug. As a responsible member of this thread I think you have a "duty of care" to support in a factual way what you have started and help those of us with less experience come to some satisfactory conclusion. Please reconsider helping to clear up this situation. Best Regards

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (2795)	10/19/2001 7:30:49 PM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4051

I agree with you on the following: "BUT... 1) When one knows something about an equity 2) How one shares what one knows about that equity 3) When one buys 4) When one sells 5) Why one buys 6) Why one sells... all of these activities fall under the aegis of due diligence and therefore SEC regulations, scruitiny and enforcement. Violators should beware." You have made some very strong statements, however also failed to offer supporting documentation. Wouldn't you agree that much of what you have stated can be a result of your opinion? Possibly your perception of various posts? I know, perception can be everything today. I wonder what some thought of this: "Hi Rose, it's been awhile..... I usually don't get involved in these chat lines but I was quite surprised to see you still insisting that you were never our investor relations person "(no, don't count me as one!!!!!!). In fact I have collected all your invoices to Mink( from May 16, 1995 to Jan 16, 1996 when your services were terminated). The invoices state: "Investor Relations and Consulting". Were we possibly mistaken as to what your services were?" Some reasonable people could misconstrue the above, based only on their perception. Yes? #reply-2400934 Then again, some could really get their panties in a knot over this: "Enjoy and if you haven't bought all you want yet, you may want to consider doing so after reading this page and considering why I believe 110% that there is GOLD IN BUSANG!!!!" #reply-1318928 Now that little bit of, shall we say enthusiasm, was on May 2, 1997. Encouraging others to buy? Please correct me if I'm wrong, as advanced age has affected my memory, but as I recall, the major collapse in BRE-X stock price had taken place. Again, forgive me if memory fails, but I seem to recall you stating that you made a profit on this stock, in fact you sold at much higher prices than those of May 2? What would a reasonable person think? Really Rose, someone with your knowledge and market savvy, never bought in again when you were 110% sure? Perception? You ask Marcos: "List ALL the Canadian stocks mentioned by thread participants, either here or on P&BMI thread and who wrote about them, pro or con?" Would you consider all of your posts, whether MINK or BRE-X, to be exempt from the standards that you are trying to apply here? I leave you with your own words to ponder: "Pump and dump operations have "fingerprints"i.e., patterns of behavior, seldom employed by one individual but usually in concert with MULTIPLE participants. " There were many participants on the BRE-X thread. Yes? Perception?