Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Ashton Technology (ASTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mst2000 who wrote (4249)	10/18/2001 2:58:49 PM
From: don denson	Respond to of 4443

thanks again .... re: "You might want to expend a little more effort at understanding the distinction." After her disclosure of mis-understanding co operations (ridiculed at length on yahoo recently).... as well as demonstrating a lack of credibility in the one and only thing she professes to be about, ie, copying public information and relaying the news.... I'd say her effect and usefulness to whoever, or whatever, is clearly at a minimum at this point in time. She will continue as a joke target in the weeks to come, should she care to remain engaged. 9 months or more of flailing away... yet, her siren call for the co's destruction and banishment is still only a dream for her. imo, she will continue to be denied the satisfaction of seeing another development co go under here..... as the development of the co's business model continues, marking growing success (despite the 9/11 setback for the industry).... small, steady, but continuing. I am buying today, missed yesterday's action (asleep at the wheel).

To: mst2000 who wrote (4249)	10/18/2001 10:31:47 PM
From: mmmary	Respond to of 4443

Wrong, mst, again West took the disclaimer off his entire website for a long, long time. SEC said put it back. He put it back for a few days then took it off again. I finally caught his disclaimer in the few day window when the disclaimer was on the website. He also didn't include it in the press releases. There's one in here mary.cc He also would send newsletters to thousands of people without the disclaimer. He rarely had that disclaimer on. Go read yahoo the early years. Why were so many people questioning whether or not he was paid? Beause he didn't tell them up front. We all had to ask and hunt it down. If I didn't have a robot monitoring his site I would have missed the few days when the disclaimer was on there. I had to use a robot to search his site to see his client pages where he had listed his services. He said for money he'd bash all negative posters on message boards. HE'd threaten to sue them. He'd turn them in for tos violations. Does that sound ethical to you? The SEC only let west off easy because he swore to them he was too sick to go back in business. Just because other companies also tanked doesn't make astn an honest or ethical company. Not only that but others rebounded yet astn hsa just gone lower. West was found guilty. My god, you will go to no end to lie and protect the con man. You must be a shill, just like him. West's lies cost people money. My honest posts would have saved them money. My projections were very close to reality. His were way off. If you're still buying shares, you really need help. That has to be the most outrageous lie I have ever read. How do you sleep at night. I pity your children.