Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (34142)	10/19/2001 12:06:35 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

For example, whether one holds bikinis to be immoral depends a lot on the factual question of whether they are likely to arouse much more than ordinary bathing suits, in a manner that increases the likelihood of sexual aggression. Absent definitive studies, it is somewhat speculative I asume it would be ok to wear them in your own home to turn on your partner as a prelude to mutual sexual aggression...

To: Neocon who wrote (34142)	10/19/2001 2:16:51 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

For example, whether one holds bikinis to be immoral depends a lot on the factual question of whether they are likely to arouse much more than ordinary bathing suits, in a manner that increases the likelihood of sexual aggression. I wonder what Imogene Kant would have said? Oh, I forgot, Kant was so sexually repressed he never played the mating game. You really can be ridiculous when you show all your cards. Some women look revolting in a bikini and some erotic in a full length dress. You're confusing style and substance in the manner of a true Kantian.