Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: St_Bill who wrote (34220)	10/18/2001 8:58:02 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I'm not sure what she understood me to be saying. I'm not sure what Neocon understood me to be saying. People often seem to misunderstand me. I think I write brief posts that are models of clarity, but of course that is my relativist opinion :-) I agree with what I think I understand you to be saying.

To: St_Bill who wrote (34220)	10/18/2001 9:52:26 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

<In what ways are we responsible for the Taliban's control of Afghanistan, > It is similar to our culpability in Iran. Different decade, but we set them up and then they fall. Is there anyone here who REALLY thinks that if a new government of any kind is set up in Afghanistan that it WON'T have to have our approval, i.e. essentially being our "puppet" or that of the U.N., at the very least, for 2 decades to come? C'mon really (you guys know who you are!)? That's probably the only way now. You've seen what's coming in microcosm with Palestine, except with more poverty and weapons, plus heroine. The soldiers going there will get strung out on 'H' just like they did in Nam. Can you imagine 'keeping the peace' in that place? Not me.