Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (130401)	10/20/2001 4:11:14 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Respond to of 436258

Mark: It all depends on the actions Gore would have taken. If Gore favored military action they I'd say more support since the right is supposed to be hawkish. On your better question with Clinton I doubt it. Clinton had renegged on too many agreements for the right to take him @ his word. Lets face it never mind all the broken budget agreements where he made the Republicans the fool but look at how he lied to the american people on national TV. He played us all for the fool. This is the type of event to put aside differences even if only temporary until crisis is past. All of our freedoms and lives are at stake. If not for the anthrax I'd say we would already have more conflicts within the house and senate. Its the nature of the beast. Our country is too diverse. Many different interests and what is right for one may not be right for the other. Its why we elect them, to represent our interests. Lets face it even now we have not seen the american resolve tested. Wait till the body bags start or captured prisoners executed on CNN. It can and unfortunately in all likelyhood will happen. Its the type of opponent we have. Then we'll have to see Bush actions and ratings. Tim