Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HG who wrote (6456)	10/20/2001 10:03:00 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

If you don't have a president, maybe a queen might help?? And if the good old guys cannot but adversarially fight, rethorically or as dogs, you might end up with the middle class tory compromise of Thatcher, the milk snatcher. Congress,parliement is supposed to represent their voters and the election system. Something else is needed to balance that. Ilmarinen. PS That is why many informed americans speak the way they do about england,no checks nor balances, although they know they speak from a not that much better situation, the catch-22 of pure 2-parties. (but england has the chance of doing something about it, although one should not speak about it) Btw, if you have some information on the election, political, procedural system of both India and Pakistan, I would be very happy Btw,btw, Australia is struggling, hope they will find some kind of solution. (rigid 2-party systems are kind of simple and easy, changing then might by difficult, and usually is)