SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (59721)10/23/2001 12:31:23 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Pravin,

You can bet your bottom dollar that Intel is working on a 64bit Pentium 4. They would be crazy to not have something to counter Hammer with -- should Hammer become wildly successful.

I think if something like that was going on, it would leak, and it would destroy Itanium.

It's like one of these explorers (Herman Cortez?) who burned all the ships in order to boost the morale of his troops, basically eliminating the possibility of retreat.

Joe



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (59721)10/23/2001 1:14:34 PM
From: g_w_northRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Intel cannot afford to validate Hammer in any way shape or form. So far Microsoft has not announced any support for the x86-64 platform (other than that web page that Milo found) and Intel would like to keep it that way. If they support the Hammer architecture obviously Microsoft would have to support it as well. Intel wants to avoid that scenario at all costs. IA-64 is their future.

What has me curious are the amount of consumers that are shying away from the top tier OEMs in the desktop market. If IBM, HP/Compaq and other top tier OEMs don't support the Hammer line, would some businesses (obviously starting with small to midsize businesses) go the same way as the consumer and shy away from top tier OEMs on server purchases? Obviously AMD could make an attractive top to bottom solution.