Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richnorth who wrote (78828)	10/25/2001 10:42:15 AM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 116753

Bush Administration to Announce New Mining Regulations, Reversing Some Clinton-Era Provisions By John Heilprin Associated Press Writer Published: Oct 24, 2001 WASHINGTON (AP) - The Interior Department will issue new mining regulations Thursday reversing some Clinton-era provisions but keeping a requirement that mining operators post bonds to guarantee they will clean up after themselves, senior department officials said. Among provisions being removed is one giving the interior secretary authority to prohibit new mine sites on federal land where they could cause lasting harm to communities and the environment, the officials said Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity. Interior's Bureau of Land Management, which manages 264 million acres of federal land, mostly in 12 Western states, planned to announce the new regulations Thursday. They are to be published as a final rule next Tuesday, taking effect 60 days later. Separately, Interior Secretary Gale Norton intends to ask Congress to join with the Bush administration in an effort to overhaul mining laws dating to 1872, the officials said. And the department's top-ranking attorney, Bill Myers, is reversing a legal opinion issued under former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt to block Glamis Gold Ltd. of Reno, Nev., from putting an open-pit mine near Indian cultural and religious sites, the officials said. Babbitt had said the sites sacred to the Quechan Tribe would be irreparably harmed by opening the mine on 1,571 acres of BLM property about 45 miles northwest of El Centro, Calif. According to industry officials, 120 well-paying jobs and 1.1 million ounces of gold worth about $300 million were at stake. Myers' new opinion says the legal basis for blocking the mine was flawed and could enable the mining proposal to be revived, a senior interior official said. Interior officials are making changes to mining regulations that went into effect on former President Clinton's last day in office but stem from hearings and discussions since the first Bush administration in 1991. The regulations, put in place over industry objections, apply to miners of hard-rock minerals, mostly gold, silver and copper in the United States. Before Clinton's regulations, mining on public lands was governed by a weaker set of regulations approved by the Interior Department in 1980. In March, President Bush's BLM proposed suspending Clinton's regulations interpreting the Federal Land Policy and Management Act passed by Congress in 1976. But the Bush administration is keeping two standards regulating the use of cyanide in leaching gold from ore and in controlling the acid that drains from rocks exposed to air and water. It also is retaining the new reclamation bond aimed at ensuring miners rather than taxpayers pick up the tab. The bond requires all mining operations, large and small, to prove they will be able to pay for damages once a mine is closed by putting up bonds - before opening a mine - that must be equal to 100 percent of the estimated cleanup cost. "The environmental community for years has advocated strict bonding standards for all operations and strong performance standards to protect resources from cyanide and acid rock drainage," said interior spokesman Eric Ruff. "We agree, and that's why we have kept these key provisions from the previous administration's rule intact." A spokesman for the National Mining Association, a trade group, said doing away with the interior secretary's ability to veto a proposed mining project doesn't mean the government will be unable to deny a mining permit. "What it means is a company won't spend a lot of money and then be told they can't open a mine," spokesman John Grasser said. Environmentalists said, however, the new regulations gut most meaningful protections and, consequently, diminish the benefits of financial protections like the new bonding requirement. "Secretary Norton seems only to have heard the demands of the mining industry. Now she's going to have to answer to the public in court," said Lexi Shultz, legislative director of the Mineral Policy Center. --- On the Net: BLM: blm.gov National Mining Association: nma.org Mineral Policy Center: mineralpolicy.org AP-ES-10-24-01 2136EDT ap.tbo.com