SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: milo_morai who wrote (59895)10/24/2001 12:58:52 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Milo, from Andreas' post:

Athlon XP 1800+ KT266A 648 671
Pentium 4 2.0 GHz i850 640 656

You're right. The Pentium 4 is behind by 1.2-2.2%, depending on whether you are talking about the base or the peak score. Maybe AMD should have called their chip Athlon XP 2000+. Maybe they still will.

wanna_bmw

P.S. It's still interesting how far ahead the Pentium 4 is in SPECfp. Despite the Athlon's strong floating point unit, this score is still a mystery. Maybe there will be more information on this in the future.



To: milo_morai who wrote (59895)10/24/2001 1:54:52 PM
From: ElmerRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
I don't see a tie, I see 2.0Ghz P4 losing. Show the two systems your looking at.

Look at Dell. It's a tie for INT.

EP